Op here
>>3485231>Yeah, it's totes immature to recognize that breasts are sexual characteristicsI think it's really weird how people, in the western hemisphere at least, have come to be so alienated from female breasts that seeing some feels immediately sexual to some of them.
>>3485246>Holding a basket or leaning on a fence while looking expressionlessly at the camera doesn't create any sort of sense of lifeNow you're doing some critique. What do you think should I have added to enhance that "sense of life"?
>It just doesn't work because the model doesn't really know what to do with her faceFair enough. She's not a professional model and we need to work at that. Any tips for expressions that would've been better suited?
>>3485308Thanks for the feedback and pointing that out. I'll work on that. Also good argument.
>>3485322Of course she's topless to add eroticism. But as the guy above mentioned, my aim was to create a scene where she might just be walking around topless in a private setting. Which happens and it is not very sexual. As in "I don't want to bang her every second of the day when she's topless at home". It's nice,,it's erotic, but i's not full-offensive display of sex.
>>3485324>>3485326Thanks, guys. I really like that.
>>3485329>Yeah, it's missing the playfulness of dubinitsky's shots.Oh, I didn't want to go for his more humorous shots with these. I aimed for a more "realistic" setting, so to speak.
>>3485333Now that's a compliment.
>>3485402Given the mixed reactions to my photos, I'm fairly sure that I succeeded. It's unusual for me to get so much reaction here on /p/. The pictures must have something.
Thanks.