>>3489902agreed. youtube can be a good source, but try to read through all the bullshit:
- 9/10 they will all have top-tier equipment which you will likely never need (and are likely financed, loaned or 'gifted' to them)
- They will all have amazon/affiliate links
- Buying presets is a fucking scam. Try and find a torrent somewhere if you don't believe me. Unless you shoot exactly like them, in the same lighting conditions, with the same subjects, with the same equipment, you'll be lucky to get anywhere near their shots. learn to make your own that fit your style.
Apart from that, follow what
>>3489790 says
Youtube is still new to the world of photography, You have almost 200 years worth of knowledge to dig into, don't limit yourself.