/p/ - Photography » Thread #3506249

[11 / 3 / ?]

164KiB, 1280x720, 902A52ED-67B8-4673-88E3-AA086382BBFE.jpg

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 06:30:25 No.3506249 View View Reply Original Report

Should i choose canon 77d or sony a6300 or what else
I usually shoot milky way , street life , landscape and some short cinematic video

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 06:32:08 No.3506251 Report

Quoted By:

don't buy a new camera

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 06:38:56 No.3506254 Report

Quoted By:

>>3506249
I'd suggest the A6400 if you can't go FF.

And then probably a WA prime like the 12mm Samyang f/2 or 16mm Sigma f/1.4 and a normal lens like the Sigma 30mm f/1.4.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 06:39:01 No.3506255 Report

Quoted By: >>3506258

Fuji.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 06:46:01 No.3506258 Report

Quoted By: >>3506262

>>3506255
It takes something like 50% more expensive X-T3 to about match a a6400 and even then the lens lineup is basically worse and mostly pricier, not least because Sigma and others not bothering or not as much with Fuji.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 32f.jpg, 10KiB, 251x242

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 06:54:37 No.3506262 Report

Quoted By: >>3506268 >>3506270

>>3506258
>buying anything third party

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 07:05:26 No.3506268 Report

Quoted By: >>3506269

>>3506262
Unlike on Fuji, the E-mount's third party support is great, so yes - that's something you'd certainly want to do because you get a lot of amazing well-priced lenses.

Particularly the many Sigmas just have no equal on the X-mount that are actually equally good, never mind the worse X-mount pendants usually still cost more. Hell, the X-mount lenses not rarely cost more than matching (and still better) FF E-mount lenses.

It's generally just a pricey mount to get (slightly less) good glass on.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO download.jpg, 11KiB, 258x195

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 07:10:39 No.3506269 Report

Quoted By: >>3506277

>>3506268
>having to buy third party because the first party lens selection is shit
You Sony salesmen really know how to sell a camera!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 07:10:46 No.3506270 Report

Quoted By: >>3506272

>>3506262
>not buying third party
figures a frogposter who grabs his images off KYM would be this stupid

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 07:14:24 No.3506272 Report

Quoted By:

>>3506270
>who grabs his images off KYM
Imagine getting triggered by this, but no I grabbed it off google you dumb fuck. Only a fully fledged autist would care about something like that .
Please pitch into the convo and don't derail this thread just because your autism meter went off

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jul 2019 07:19:04 No.3506277 Report

Quoted By:

>>3506269
The first party lens selection certainly isn't nearly as good as the overall selection with the 3rd party lenses added, even though it's of course already better than Fujis (taking into account that some lenses would be FF ones).

Either way, Fuji's almost only first party + some MF lenses subsequently just looks terrible in comparison. They should have provided the mount specs and protocol to anyone interested for cheap/free ages ago - unfortunately they did not and that's the result now.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches