Further considerations. There are some questionable pictures:
>>3512829The fence, at least the upper part, guides along the horizon but also covers the horizon. Without the fence (without foreground) I would have the panorama problem. The fences upper part is hiding a road, on which headlights of cars would have set interest, which I wanted to avoid.
>>3512832Highlight in the sky and the lines guide viewers out of the frame. The left 2/3 catch little to no interest and could benefit from lifted exposure/highlights. I took this only because of great colors, which the picture honestly doesn't show.
>>3512833There are two obvious motifs that fight against each other and thus also place interest in the middle between the motifs. The car is in the foreground according to highlights, the ascending diagonal support the facade. I'm not sure about the verticals.
>>3512835Tidy or balanced, consistent, therefore calm. Perhaps too abstract and too inexplicable.
>>3512836I don't know! It was also more of playing around. I can't do anything with that. I probably should've left out that traffic light and focus on the background as I was interested about the background and took this shot only as the position of the bus and cars in the background worked.
>>3512837The composition is garbage, but the scene has very uniform natural colors. In addition, I saw a shine and beautiful gradient in the foliage of the trees, which is not visible here.
>>3512839Frame in frame and juxtaposition. Maybe it would be nice to put at least one edge on a tree trunk, if not both.
>>3512840Color juxtaposition on a path that leads through the frame.
>>3512841Similar to the previous picture, but not so clear, even distracting from each other.
>>3512842Again similar to the previous pictures on top of a one-point perspective that also has a (admittedly neglectible) person in the center point.
>>3512845Two motifs fighting against each other. Reflection and bridge/one-point perspective.
