>>3517052>Do you think people already forgot that you people were the ones who came up with safe spaces against "microagressions" in the first place?Who is this "you people" you're talking about?
>Trannies are extremely common in advertisements, several thousand percent overrepresented actually.lol, my man suddenly has the numbers
Trans people in the US are estimated at 0,6%, so you're saying that "several" times 6% of US advertisements star trans people. Several means at the very least 2 so let's charitably say 12%. 12% of ads. You're delusional.
I'll give you a much easier challenge: if you can prove that even 0,1% of ads (that's 1 in a thousand) contains a trans person, I'll send you $100 over whatever platform you want or donate it to a charity of your choice.
I'd argue that if statistically accurate representation is what we're going for, trans people are actually severely underrepresented in media. But once again, giving a hoot about the advertising industry is retarded.
>I can't take you seriously if you're so desperate that your only "argument" is misrepresenting what I say and imitating a child's voice.Your only argument is 'trans people are icky and I see them too often'. There's nothing rational or even vaguely resembling an established fact in anything you've posted so far. It's a bunch of opinions at best.
>The only hate filled people here are you who can't to two sentences without using immature insults and name calling.>unironically lookslikeyouvegotsomegrowinguptodo.jpgOh excuse me, Sir. Yes, I'm being the hate filled one here while you're calling trans people repulsive fetishists that are a blight on the planet comparable with diseases that kill millions. (inb4 cuz they are) But I'm the one being impolite to your fee-fees by calling you a reactionary dumbass.
Grow thicker skin, snowflake.
>A small group of people convinced the marketAnd who might this "small group of people" be, pray tell?
