>>3519708>B&W, subject on the lower left, tons of negative space>>3519709>>3519821I'm not the other anon, but
>>3519408I think you should keep following it, but your definition is too simple. Add to it! In every single picture you should play with the conditions in an interesting way.
>>3518048Here you have two massive elements, the cloud cover and the massive sky above. The lighthouse is graceful. Notice how the lighthouse is isolated with foreground background differences in grayscale.
>>3518421The background and the building are disdainful, the building looks put there carelessly. In contrast, the background offers kind of a spotlight for the building and there are pretty reflections in the upper windows. I wish there would be more focus on the upper windows.
>>3519708I think I would have found it exciting if the sky was clear again at the top, so only the bottommost clouds remained. The building seems to "look" out of the frame. I don't know how to put this yet.
>>3519709It's the most typical building in the series which I expect in such a view. The other buildings look rather out of place. Nevertheless, I find something about this, but not tangible.
