>>3538800I don't know which are yours. So a bit of a mix, I guess.
>>3532090This one was intriguing. Nice subject, but it's entirely lost in frame, with nothing leading to it. I don't think more open aperture would help, but I'd be at least interested in the appearance.
>>3532104>>3532105These two are what I'd consider thoughtless. Good eye for the subjects, little thought put into execution. Maybe not that, possibly just inexperience. Both, I believe, would benefit from closer framing and softer shadows that you'd get at different time of day.
A big general advice would be that you need to eliminate clutter from the frame as much as possible. Scout the scenes a little before you take images. Look thought viewfinder, and imagine taking shots. Higher, lower, move closer, further. If possible remember the location and come back at a different light, and take similar shots, and do a little personal project out of them. You see for yourself what works and what doesn't, and that way you grow by yourself, and while doing that you learn.
