>>3533703>open up pic from my S9+ with "SUPER DUPER CAMERA">noisy as fuck>horrible shit interlacing-looking filter>shit dynamic rangephone cameras are optimized for phone viewing
Yes, the picture might look ABSOLUTELY MAGNIFICENT on your phone screen, and it might even look good on your mac if you're a macfag, but when you end up trying to edit them in LR or PS, they look like hammered shit 100% of the time
These companies market their phone cameras knowing all of these faggots will just send them straight to Instagram and all of their editing will happen in that little 1000x1000 square
There's just simply absolutely no way you can get anything more than acceptable quality from a 5x4mm sensor and a teeny tiny lens. You can tell phone pics without even blowing up the thumbnail.
But please market your phone cameras as much as you can, make sure you keep plebs bleeding $2000 almost every year for something that'll be obsolete next year
