New round of catching all pics without any replies:
>>3536180I don't quite get the framing, and find it a bit boring desu. Sorry...
>>3536306Looks more interesting in there. Maybe a tiny bit closer would be perfect.
>>3536693I still have a digital camera bough 15 years ago on a closet, and it gets less noise than this.
>>3536828Nothing too interesting, and the crop at the bottom doesn't quite work.
>>3536932Those two pics have really beautiful colours, and the background bokeh is gorgeous, but they could improve the framing, and the main DoF is so shallow that the main subject is mostly OOF. Keep working on it!
>>3536947I prefer the first of these two, even with the leg cutting. The second one I find not so interesting, and the shadow on the guy, and the woman with the red shirt in front of the girl don't help. But all in all, not bad either.
>>3537264Not my thing, but I can see what you were going for. Not bad.
>>3537540I guess you were going for an antique look, and you got it. Not my thing really, but can't complain either.
>>3537588I find the background interesting, and it's funny how the tree hides the colour change of the metal structure. Not about birds, though.
>>3537662My favourite of those you posted. I can only imagine how hard it was to shoot it... You nailed the focus, and the spider was in a interesting position with its prey, not to mention the tiny droplets on the net. Beautiful!!!
>>3537692The framing could have been better, but you don't always get the time to get it right. Other than that, it's pretty good, and I love the wasp's "pose". Nice one.
>>3537747I find these a bit boring, and the middle one, while the less boring one, looks like the typical tourist pic. Not my thing, sorry.
>>3538103I don't get why you want even more noise on that. Nothing too interesting, looks like a typical IG photo, but more noisy.
>>3538169Needs more sharpness. I like the idea, but the image quality needs some help.
[cont...]
