>>3562720>OM-D E-M5 II>16mp>FHD only>no 4k>no 1080p @ 120 slow mo>$900 on Amazon BODY ONLYWhy are you pushing this expensive, antiquated PoS?
>>3562640The a6000 is only $650 on Amazon WITH A LENS. If you have $900 to spend on the body alone there are much better options. If you're really into video look at something with 4k from Sony or Fuji. Hell, I can even recommend Canon here since they released the M6 mark II with full width 4k. And at 24mp to 32mp you won't need "muh gimmick stitch mode."
For video even if your final output will be FHD, starting from 4k will result in much higher quality. And even if you don't care about 4k at all you could get an a6000 with lens and a fucking gimbal for the price of the em5ii.