Alright, I've just had a chance to read though your fucking strawmen of me, you fucking piece of shit psychopath.
Really clever how how you thought that would make me look stupid, when my prior arguments were addressing the fact you were talking about "sharpness" which I told you repeatedly = resolution+accutance, which I left you with these
>>3563332 >>3563342 to get your best explanation of how the fuck you were so stupid not to understand this. You even posted your goddamned retarded book bullshit here
>>3563338 that you never answered my challenge for here
>>3563342 apparently thinking
>>3563350 was a suitable answer which doesn't make any fucking sense, they don't "normalize" anything when they're measuring sharpness, as resolution (the lens) plus accutance (the sampling medium) is what they're trying to measure!
So then you apparently were so backed into a corner that you start arguing AS ME after I was gone for awhile and you weren't getting the responses you wanted.
So you pose as me, apparently saying that Lensrentals, who I've CONSISTENTLY held up (along with Imaging Resource) as THE most reliable benchmarking site. because of their rigor. and the fact they USE A FUCKING TEST BENCH, are measuring system MTF.
Well let's analyze your critical fucking mistake in reasoning that would lead you to believe that posting as me and making this argument made you look good, you absolute fucking imbecile. You see, I consistently posted for half the fucking thread that you were conflating resolution with sharpness. Now, I KNOW that Lens Rentals measures pure MTF, it's why I constantly post their MTF results here rather than the fucking garbage DxO shit that Sonyshill loves to jerk off over. So here's where you fucked up, you absolute fucking psychopathic imbecile:
PURE MTF EQUALS RESOLUTION, NOT SHARPNESS.
SYSTEM MTF MEASURES SHARPNESS, WHICH LENS RENTALS DOESN'T DO.
1/2
