>>3569518Name one thing that puts a canon r or z6 over an a7iii.
Sonys is the most affordable, has the best af, best colour subjectively and objectively, best lens selection, is the smallest and lightest, has the best battery life, best 3rd party support, fastest af, fastest burst with caf, quickest buffer clear, largest buffer, etc etc.
Nobody without a "wahhhhhh sony" personality disorder would say a7iii wasn't the best entry level ff.
>>3569598That's the benefit of making everything in house, you can ensure efficiency from front to back.
>>3569683>wahhh I need to actively ignore all the professional standards and objective testing criteria to pretend my camera isn't worse than yoursTypical Nony user
>>3569704Olympus have little to no say in the electronics in their cameras, they don't have the experience to make a highly energy efficient device. Sony have been doing this shit since the 70's, and they've always come out on top, Walkman, discman, psp, doesn't fucking matter, sony always get more energy efficiency out of their products than anyone else.
>>3569708Yes you spaz, most manufacturers show a lower cipa rating for evf vs lcd, other manufacturers don't list both. Another score for "limpanon is a dumb"
>>3569730What the hell is a bug man? A person that uses facts to back up his arguments or summat?
>>3569734When people got smartphones they whined about the battery too, no one went back to their 3210 tho. Mirrorless just does more, better. And a 30g battery in your pocket is a small price to pay.
>>3569750Please, please explain to me how much extra of my battery is used my a7iii when I attach a flash...
>>3569765Who needs focus when you have 27 feet of coc?
