>>3583712>its -20 celcium>>3583670>pic only shows -1 celciusi want off the ruse cruise
jk anon, the reason why the camera shake on that one "ruins" the shot is because all of your other shots are crisp and clean, and that seems to be one of the consistent aspects of the shot. So one that suffers from camera shake stands out and looks accidental or poor. On a different set, it would be a strong photo; in your set, it stands out (not in a good way).
>>3583672this one is defocused, but it looks deliberate since the focus is on the foreground snow, and it separates the viewer from the figures walking on the street. The defocus adds to the atmosphere, and looks like a very deliberate choice, while the shutter shake in
>>3583658 looks accidental. That doesn't mean it's a bad photo per se, but that it takes away from the portfolio when you add it to an otherwise very consistent style
especially when these two pics stand out for how crisp and clear they are
>>3583669>>3583671(not saying you need better gear, but you can make a choice about including something stylistic coherent with your set or not)