>>3585474>>3585475>>3585477>>3585478>>3585511>>3585854>some anon picks up a camera and in one week takes pictures better than 90% of /p/really tells you the absolute state of this board
Anon you have a good eye for composition. Barring the technical aspects (getting exposure settings just right; postprocessing) and just being a bit more deliberate about your compositions, these are really good.
Just need to be a bit tighter and focused on your compositions. Like this
>>3585511, this anon here has a good crop
>>3585771 (i would also photoshop out the car + power lines)
>>3585474underexposed, and i would crop a little bit off from the bottom (too much underexposed rock and messy branches
>>3585475very nice, just needs some good post processing + color correction (or even black and white edit) and you're golden.,
>>3585476not that great as shot since the rock in the bottom left takes up and inordinate amount of the frame and is distracting. You have some interesting trees and fog I would crop to that
>>3585477excellent shot. just needs better post processing.
>>3585478very nice. needs better postprocessing, could have a tighter crop around the subject (mountains) since the sky is too complex to be left as pure negative space.
>>3585854good shit.
>>3585771>Also, at f11, f14, you're probably entering diffraction on your lenseslike this anon says, on your 50D no need to go past f/11. Aim for f/8 if you want maximum depth of field and only use f/11 if you really need to have a long focus depth; you're causing your images to unnecessarily become "muddy". With f/8, you will be able to give yourself a bit faster shutter speed (less camera shake) and ISO (less color noise) to work with.
