>>3590782Sky here is radioactive. Good shots if fixed.
>>3590787Samey but cozy.
>>3590829 to >>3590840This set is decent. Good eye, good colour editing, but I think that all of them were underexposed when taken. When going for low key, low contrast images you should expose for full histogram, then edit them for under look.
>>3591818>>3591820>>3591822Better. They look like a natural progression by learning compared to above. There's purple spot on the first one right in the middle of the frame, i'd bet it's from colour work. And I'd clone stamp most, if not all, birds from the bottom panorama.
Style is presentation as much as it's shooting. You've few sets that would work very well in a single thread, but when you put home shots in, cat, concert, one city shot, macro, some architecture, you get mishmash that's hard to follow.
>>3590787>>3590788>>3590789>>3590796Take this sequence, for example. You've unified colour scheme there, in that way they'd go well together. But you didn't put them together in a thread, you have three with white borders, one without, different crops among them, and first two are of the same scene. All in all presentation looks amateurish, even though they're quality images. Of the first two, personally I think that second one works better, but that's something you should be able to decide on your own, and include only one when you're presenting them.
