>>3591580 is nice and relaxing with multiple layers. Don't really know much aside from trying to crop differently where you could improve the composition.>>3591581 is far less interesting and bland. You've blurred the background in >>3591583, implying the foreground is important, but the grass isn't doing much for me.>>3591588 is the strongest of your macro shots by far, mostly because of the colors. I think your DoF is maybe too short, and tighter crop on the focused portions might improve it.Nice light and decent subject in
>>3591590. The sensor didn't have enough range, so the lights and darks are both squashed. If I had to pick here, maybe favor the shadows just to get some form back on the guy's wetsuit in places? Not much going on in that sky anyway.
>>3593089> I wish i zoomed out a bit hereMakes two of us.
>>3593091Is not a bad composition, but it looks out of focus. Also, I know the sky is pulling a lot of dynamic range out, but there's a lot of value range on those rocks being lost that would have been interesting. Right side of the pic is bland.
I get why the dog is where is in
>>3593101, but you chopped that poor person's head right off.
>>3599253I'm not sure closing in on the sculpture wouldn't make for a better photo than a wide angle pastoral shot.
Grain effect looks okay on phone, but absolutely terrible on desktop. If you're trying to emulate film, it's missing something.
