>>3595518>but they have taken 3 objective measurements and weighted themAre you completely incapable of look g at the site? They quite clearly score each of the 3 criteria and indicate what scenario each one would be preferable.
Color depth is important for good skin tones, so is labelled portrait.
High iso performance is important for sports so you can get clean images with a fast ss.
Dynamic range is important for landscape, where there's likely to be very bright and dark areas.
What are you finding difficult about this? Is that all too complicated? Then great, they have an overall ranking too, based off the weighting decided by clearly much more experienced photographers than you.
It's a win-win-win situation. Unless you're just mad that your camera scored shite and want to just bash dxo instead. Lol.
>did you watch pippi as a kidWho? And no, you clearly watched too much television, your brain is mush.
