[127 / 15 / ?]
Quoted By: >>3596787 >>3596789 >>3596790 >>3596808 >>3596834 >>3596928 >>3596953 >>3597102 >>3597159 >>3599294 >>3599655 >>3599846 >>3599893 >>3602250 >>3602334 >>3604597 >>3604697 >>3604928 >>3606072 >>3609339
I never knew Full Frame was so much better than APSC.
First there is less noise.
And the most important part: The bokeh is much more noticeable.
I used to shoot with a Nikon D7000 + 35mm 1.8g DX.
Now I've gone to a Nikon D750 + 50mm 1.8 D
People here told me the 35mm 1.8 on APSC was equivalent to 50mm 1.8 on FF.
I had to manually add more blur on Photoshop with the D7000 + 35mm 1.8g to make my photos look more professional.
Now with a Full Frame and a 50mm 1.8 D I no longer need to do it anymore, the out of focus bokeh looks very blurry.
I fell sorry for the m4/3 users who have a tiny sensor and even less bokeh.
First there is less noise.
And the most important part: The bokeh is much more noticeable.
I used to shoot with a Nikon D7000 + 35mm 1.8g DX.
Now I've gone to a Nikon D750 + 50mm 1.8 D
People here told me the 35mm 1.8 on APSC was equivalent to 50mm 1.8 on FF.
I had to manually add more blur on Photoshop with the D7000 + 35mm 1.8g to make my photos look more professional.
Now with a Full Frame and a 50mm 1.8 D I no longer need to do it anymore, the out of focus bokeh looks very blurry.
I fell sorry for the m4/3 users who have a tiny sensor and even less bokeh.
