>>3605961It's a good genre but one co-opted by strange ideologies from some sneaky and slimy individuals.
It should be just landscaping in hard/man-made environments along with man's interaction in it, not a voyeuristic and downright douche activity from cunts flashing people on the public sideway.
>Nobody, and I mean nobody wants to see any more b/w portraits of fucking street urchin homeless peoplePart of the ideological aspect of it, which is okay as a direct critic to something/someone but not as a way to make money from misery gluttons. I blame the jews for this genre degeneration.
I don't understand the need to make B&W all the time, thou
