/p/ - Photography » Thread #3602466

[44 / 12 / ?]

2MiB, 4032x2268, 1.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 17 Jan 2020 18:52:03 No.3602466 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3602542 >>3602760 >>3604903 >>3605182 >>3605808 >>3605809 >>3605817 >>3607430

r8? simple yet still artistic and pleasing..

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Jan 2020 18:58:24 No.3602467 Report

Quoted By:

uncreative and bland

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 17 Jan 2020 23:06:12 No.3602542 Report

Quoted By:

>>3602466
Just getting started huh?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 06:52:58 No.3602704 Report

Quoted By:

If you had a telescope, this would've been a good horizontal shot. With the trail and what not

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 10:50:46 No.3602760 Report

Quoted By: >>3602846

>>3602466
This is a shot that everyone does within the first 500 shots of getting their first camera

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 15:24:49 No.3602846 Report

Quoted By: >>3602855

>>3602760
This. Togheter with the classic flower "macro" shots and pet ones

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1579361818936.jpg, 283KiB, 741x509

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 15:38:13 No.3602855 Report

Quoted By: >>3602858 >>3605810

>>3602846
Don't forget this masterpizza.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 15:43:11 No.3602858 Report

Quoted By: >>3602867

>>3602855
>pigeon toed faggot
Snapshitting is the least of his worries.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1579364447414.jpg, 341KiB, 852x504

Anonymous Sat 18 Jan 2020 16:33:46 No.3602867 Report

Quoted By: >>3603253

>>3602858
Let's up the ante.

/\M8U5H !!xdbnFmgMDvT

/\M8U5H !!xdbnFmgMDvT Sun 19 Jan 2020 14:05:39 No.3603253 Report

Quoted By: >>3603266 >>3603285 >>3604761 >>3604853 >>3607432

>>3602867
Why is everybody on this board so skinny?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 19 Jan 2020 14:37:40 No.3603266 Report

Quoted By: >>3603285 >>3604852 >>3607431

>>3603253
Why are you fat ?

/\M8U5H !!zJbpV0948+w

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 82662.png, 180KiB, 489x368

/\M8U5H !!zJbpV0948+w Sun 19 Jan 2020 15:14:49 No.3603285 Report

Quoted By:

>>3603253
>>3603266

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 22 Jan 2020 22:26:17 No.3604761 Report

Quoted By:

>>3603253
Put the fork down fatass lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jan 2020 04:09:41 No.3604852 Report

Quoted By:

>>3603266
You literally cannot tell. You can only tell that he is not obese, thus the implication is that you yourself are a land whale.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 23 Jan 2020 04:11:33 No.3604853 Report

Quoted By:

>>3603253
You literally cannot tell. You can only tell that he is not obese, thus the implication is that you yourself are a land whale.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20200110-121750280.jpg, 3MiB, 2048x1537

Anonymous Thu 23 Jan 2020 07:46:43 No.3604903 Report

Quoted By: >>3605182 >>3605814

>>3602466
I have one like this which I much prefer.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO img054.jpg, 2MiB, 3328x2071

Anonymous Fri 24 Jan 2020 00:37:32 No.3605182 Report

Quoted By: >>3605812

>>3602466
if we're posting shitty photos of the sky, let me join in. I know it's shit, but I kinda like it t.bh
>>3604903
I like this one

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20200125_061125.jpg, 173KiB, 475x701

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:13:08 No.3605808 Report

Quoted By:

>>3602466
Everyone's done it dude its cool

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:17:02 No.3605809 Report

Quoted By: >>3605815

>>3602466
If Gordon Ramsay was a photographer, he would have killed you.
But this could have been taken with a smartphone, and it would not have been less good. What were you trying to achieve there?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:18:04 No.3605810 Report

Quoted By:

>>3602855
>Oh wow such contrast, such detail!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:21:06 No.3605812 Report

Quoted By: >>3605900 >>3606059

>>3605182
This is an odd one. Many would say that the dark corner at the top is disturbing and it should be out of the picture...but the eagle alone would be rather boring.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:22:09 No.3605814 Report

Quoted By:

>>3604903
>Destroyed OP

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:23:36 No.3605815 Report

Quoted By: >>3605816 >>3606042

>>3605809
If Gordon Ramsay was a photographer, he would kill you for shooting fucking RAW.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:25:58 No.3605816 Report

Quoted By:

>>3605815
kek good one.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO thumbnail.jpg, 38KiB, 720x479

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:30:22 No.3605817 Report

Quoted By: >>3605820 >>3605955

>>3602466
Best one

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 12:37:53 No.3605820 Report

Quoted By:

>>3605817
I would have cut the left side, but yes pretty good otherwise

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 15:41:50 No.3605900 Report

Quoted By: >>3605923

>>3605812
the film is what gives it soul, not the corner
if it was shot digitally, people would call it a snapshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 16:16:29 No.3605923 Report

Quoted By:

>>3605900
I wouldn't say that...the film adds to it, but that's not why the picture kinda works

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 18:10:47 No.3605955 Report

Quoted By: >>3607514

>>3605817
The plane is photoshopped in.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 22:04:25 No.3606042 Report

Quoted By:

>>3605815
But I use a Japanese camera.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 25 Jan 2020 22:34:46 No.3606059 Report

Quoted By:

>>3605812
the dark corner is a roof and unfortunately that was just a crow, not an eagle or hawk

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 08:04:08 No.3607430 Report

Quoted By:

>>3602466
Would be better if the plane was centered and the chemtrail was going straight down the middle

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Blocks your path.jpg, 55KiB, 677x1024

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 08:05:28 No.3607431 Report

Quoted By:

>>3603266
COME AT ME

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Mr skeleton.jpg, 141KiB, 768x1024

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 08:14:14 No.3607432 Report

Quoted By:

>>3603253
I'm not THAT bad

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC06693.jpg, 58KiB, 800x535

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 12:08:25 No.3607482 Report

Quoted By: >>3607492 >>3607674

r8? simple yet still artistic and pleasing..

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1D312B03-FCCB-4B60-A9D5-1208EACF (...).jpg, 378KiB, 2148x1536

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 12:44:32 No.3607492 Report

Quoted By: >>3607674 >>3607977

>>3607482
magnificent, reminds me of the sky on a clear sunny day.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 13:42:20 No.3607514 Report

Quoted By: >>3607530

>>3605955
Not too long ago a well known ig photog who won a photo contest got exposed for shopping a plane in one of his contest winning shots. Think he also lost some endorsements after that and served up a weak apology about not knowing the effect of his action he just wanted to enhance the scene and forgot to tell them he shopped it

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 14:04:46 No.3607530 Report

Quoted By: >>3607543

>>3607514
Strange they never ask for proof of the raw file in these contests.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 14:19:57 No.3607543 Report

Quoted By: >>3607545 >>3607547 >>3607749

>>3607530
Photography contests should be only about what the finished picture looks like, not how the artist got there IMO.
That means, in [Current Year], photography is as much if not more about editing skill as it is about picture taking skill. Actually, it always was. Editing photos is as old as photography itself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 14:24:07 No.3607545 Report

Quoted By:

>>3607543
Reminds me of a French photog I use to watch years ago. He started out with actual tips about composition and other great how to videos then he discovered lightroom and all his videos focused on how he enhances pictures then takes it a step further by adding in sunrays and all sorts of fancy fake overcooked effects essentially creating an entirely new photo from the base. He still considers himself a photographer. I suppose his presets sell really well because he's still at it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 14:29:07 No.3607547 Report

Quoted By:

>>3607543
I didn’t say they should examine how the final pic got there. I’m saying the raw should be used as reference to the final to verify it isn’t shopped bullshit. At that point it loses integrity and isn’t an actual photograph. Post processing on the others hand doesn’t introduce objects that aren’t there to begin with but enhances the original photo which is reasonable in terms of a “Photography” contest. This ain’t digital art design.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 18:26:57 No.3607674 Report

Quoted By:

>>3607482
Yeah. A bit too simple though.
>>3607492
This is actually impressive.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 28 Jan 2020 19:23:37 No.3607749 Report

Quoted By:

>>3607543
If you're submitting a photo of a girafe in a girafe contest but the girafe is shopped in, then that photo should not be winning.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 29 Jan 2020 03:43:20 No.3607977 Report

Quoted By:

>>3607492
Ansel Adams would approve!

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches