>>3610997best of your set. good job with lighting and frame balancing.
>>3611064f3 is a based camera.
>>361106635mm or 50mm. depends on your city. if its tourist heavy use the 35mm. If you have to deal with lots of homeless people then use the 50mm to allow some distance in case they try to attack you for having a camera (has happened to me several times already)
>>3611073Feels like a good note, but not a great photo. Interesting place for a portrait perhaps? I do like the scene
>>3611074>>3611076eh. Not the biggest fan. 2nd one is kinda...interesting?
>>3611078Seems like a car snapshot to me.
>>3611082Nice pan, boring car though.
>>3611142good pan, good subject, kind of boring composition though.
>>3611145this is better
>>3611254>>3611255>>3611256>>3611259>>3611260>>3611261>>3611263>>3611264these are fantastic and the B&W looks great, so does the editing. Good job.
>>3611306>>3611308truly inspired by branchanon
>>3611311best so far
>>3611312could have been more interesting? I don't know. Its got a vintage vibe to it that I dig.
>>3611343very nice anon. Simple color palate works well. Do you do graphic design?
>>3611357>>3611359>>3611361best
>>3611364worst. Crop in closer.
>>3611441this is the memeiest borders ive seen
>>3611538moon boy
>>3611671I like the subject and the execution here. Very interesting.
>>3611720could use some editing for colors, I think.
>>3611804based point and shoot digishit
>>3611898>>3611899>>3611902it looks like stock video footage from the early 90s in a bad way. The saturation is weird and the images aren't sharp. shooting at a high aperture like f25 is causing your images to be heavily softened by diffraction and your compositions need adjustment.
Work on either color theory, or composition, but do them at seperate times. Then, later, once you understand both completely, come back and reshoot these places.
>>3611922good subject but a bit touristy.
>>3611926this is v. nice.
