>>3615546Yes, 4 times better signal to noise ratio on the ff camera, and 4 times sharper images as Larger sensors with larger pixels are less demanding on a lens, and you get much more bokeh, if your shot needs it.
Just so much more versatile, whether that be shooting in darker conditions, using a much faster shutter speed whilst still having acceptable high iso noise, creating stronger subject separation via bokeh, or just having consistently sharper shots on MUCH cheaper lenses. Full frame wins every time, and is in real world terms no larger or more expensive.
For example a ff 35mm 2.8 is about $230, an mft 35mm 2.8 equivalent (17mm 1.4) isn't only over $700, it weighs more than 4 times as much and doesn't give as sharp results.
The important bit, the sensor, doesn't scale image quality with price, the crop sensor in a $1500 fuji or $400 sony body is identical. Sensors only start differentiating when you change size, or you're spending over $2k on a ff body, specialist sensors don't exist for mft because no real photographer cares about mft.
