Let me show you how we came to where we are now: This is you
>>3612757>Sigma is finished I guess. Something went horribly wrong, and theory couldn't align with practice.You tried to badmouth Sigma down after some news that you perceived were negative and damaging for them.
You were countered in your claim by this post:
>>3612761>FP is unexpected success. They sell like hotcakes, outselling both Canon and Nikon ff mirrorless. Delaying foveon is a businesses decision.This is the post you are hung out on even now. In light of all that's been mentioned, first sentence is truth. Second one is verifiable. Last one is opinion.
You immediately incorrectly assumed that it meant all full frame cameras. I'm certain that you made that mistake, since your graphs and comments in
>>3612765 mention all full frame sales and not just mirrorless full frame. After this whole discussion diverged into fight on two fronts. Whether Sigma sales, or it does not.
If you observe correctly your mind initially jumped on ff sales. It erroneously connected it with total full frame sales. This is your hook. Your psyche is damaged to such degree that your mind refused to accept your mistakes. You dived into whole discussion with total disregard. Even when you were clearly mocked and made fun of by someone trolling your with clear and obvious bates. You stuck by your fabrication. You needed to continue Sigma selling line. It was the line that could prove your adversary wrong and you correct. It is because you thought you were right in your head from the start.
You need to realise that it is a pointless discussion. It means nothing to you. You are one person before the computer that angrily argued few minute points that mean nothing to you with people that did mocked you and riled you on to do it. You have nothing to do with Sigma, you have nothing to do with Sony. They are multinational companies. You are insignificant peon that should spend time bettering yourself with more meaningful tasks.
