>>3622310>>several still only items>All I see in your stupid fucking list is>>CANON DOES EVERYTHING THE BEST BECAUSE THAT'S THE LOGO PRINTED ON THE CAMERA I OWNLOL where in the fuck did I say that? That's the response of someone who is MAD that Canon is bringing out an 8k FF 45mp mirrorless.
>>40-45 MP>Has been available since like 2016, try fucking harder>>12/20 FPS>This is 1.) not new or exciting This all traces back to you saying 'hurr durr video cam with shitty stills' to which I replied by listing all the specs relevant for stills.
>>better build quality than (this one brand that lives in my head rent free)>lmaoCanon, Nikon, Olympus, and probably Pentax have the best build/sealing period. The rest fall behind. That's relevant to stills shooters, not just video shooters.
>>only actual one doing something interesting with lenses>subjective, yet again. Sony is still struggling to match Canon's FF EF catalog while Canon introduces shit like the 28-70 f/2, the ultra compact 70-200, and f/1.2 primes that are Zeiss sharp to the corners wide open. Nikon hasn't done anything interesting yet with their Z mount except one super fast prime lens. What is anyone else doing in FF mirrorless glass that's truly new/improved/different?
>>only one with truly seamless adaptation>citation neededYou need a citation for the obvious? Tell me what other mirrorless mount lets you attach ALL lenses from the company's SLR mount and have every single one function perfectly as if it was native to the mirrorless mount. You can take the very first EF lenses made from the 35mm film days and attach them to an R with full AF, aperture control, and IS, and no glitches or issues with AF speed.