>>3638072>You're full of it. >*wink*>Not his best workyes i agree; but its ~iconic~
>obviously stagedthe shadow is also edited in apparently, but i don't see how this(these) are issues
>you're criticising all the wrong thingsthe only thing i've criticized is the crop
>It looks fantastic already as a thumbnail.and this is where i disagree, on my screen at least, the subject looks as small as an ant in the thumbnail. wouldn't you agree that the thumbnail i posted works much better?