>>3640644>They haven’t done anything “kaizen” in two years now. Gotta protect that xt-3.2 years sure is a long time, huh anon?
>And I doubt very much that the image processing couldn’t be done on older hardware.Could it be approximated to a degree? Sure, but no, it literally can't be done exactly the same, which leaves a quality control issue for them to deal with instead.
It's not hard to wrap your mind around "new features that use a processor twice as powerful need said processor to function properly"
you really just come off as having sour grapes, try saving your money up instead of expecting a company to put in the legwork to export features back in time to more limited equipment.
It's probably quite possible with enough know-how to run Luminar 4 on a Windows 98 machine, but you shouldn't be surprised there's no rush to offer it.
have you tried saving your money if you need these new features so much, anon?
