>>3664318I actually have the 55-250 (first edition, non-STM model)
I'm just finding the autofocus missing a *lot* and generally taking a long time, even in what I'd consider to be good conditions & manual focusing just feels too rough to be comfortable.
It's at the point where I've had more success shooting with a vintage Yashica 70-210.
That's why I'm looking for something better.
>>3664316Assuming I can find a prime I'll probably go for that, otherwise there's plenty of relatively affordable 100-400mm Canons for ~500-600€
Would you happen to know what the deal with the Tamron 100-400MM F/4,5-6,3 VC USD is though?
It's a little slower, yes, but even brand new from a store it costs in the same ballpark as the used Canons.
