/p/ - Photography » Thread #3670052

>>3670057
>>3670070
I think these two have it right. Bottom pic is what we usually think of with HDR, but as you can see from the histograms, your pictures have the shadows and highights pushed into the midtones.

>>3670074
Your camera can probably do auto HDR but it won't have this low contrast look. You'd have to edit it in Photoshop/Lightroom/Darktable afterwards. You can probably get this look with a backwards S-curve (look up S curve and what that does to the image, then do it the other way round)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1591930361852s.jpg, 491KiB, 1397x930

Anonymous Fri 12 Jun 2020 17:25:11 No.3670092 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670052
Someone also pointed to Ben Tomas in sqt thread. I don't think it's quite the same process.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 Jun 2020 17:28:11 No.3670093 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670075
I think I just contracted super eye gonorrhea from the second pic..

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 Jun 2020 17:57:19 No.3670106 Report

Quoted By: >>3670131

It seems one could do seamless HDR by bracketing exposure, doing a luminance "band pass" to make all but the usable values transparent and then using curves to match up luminance on the cross over points between the layers. I kind of want to try this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 Jun 2020 19:14:55 No.3670131 Report

Quoted By: >>3670144 >>3670174

>>3670106
There is complete lack of shadows in these images. And it's not just lifted black values, they appear colourised as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 Jun 2020 19:30:46 No.3670144 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670131
If you bracketed wide open enough and with enough exposures you could theoretically get as much dynamic range as you wanted and get clean saturated shadows

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 Jun 2020 20:45:49 No.3670174 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670131
There are plenty of shadows but they are subtly colored and projected mostly vertically.
The aesthetic also seems to rely a lot on straight parallel lines and geometric shapes, I really like the set in the OP but his other photos seem a lot more average and don't push the same buttons.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO gotit.jpg, 666KiB, 1371x1037

Anonymous Sat 13 Jun 2020 22:56:48 No.3670658 Report

Quoted By: >>3670659 >>3670679

I think I got it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO starting.jpg, 560KiB, 1299x924

Anonymous Sat 13 Jun 2020 22:59:08 No.3670659 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670658
It's not merged hdr. Just lifted shadows, and colourised.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 Jun 2020 23:16:23 No.3670661 Report

Quoted By:

Wanted to post larger image of result, and I lost it due to stupidity...

It's pretty simple. Raw is preferred. You're colourising mainly with temperature and tint. Selections are done with colour only. In camera raw, you just roughly paint selection, then put range mask to colour and select area to work with. Should be possible with most raw editors.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jun 2020 00:05:19 No.3670669 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670052
just like my animes

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jun 2020 00:38:02 No.3670679 Report

Quoted By: >>3670846

>>3670658
Curves are all over the place, not soft enough

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Jun 2020 14:07:29 No.3670846 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670679
>curves are all over the place
Can we start speaking english again?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO test1.jpg, 2MiB, 2000x1333

Anonymous Sun 14 Jun 2020 22:34:15 No.3671043 Report

Quoted By: >>3671045 >>3671107

I tried to replicate this too, I bracketed three exposures with 1 stop difference of eachother in the first one and three stops in the second one

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO test2.jpg, 2MiB, 2000x1333

Anonymous Sun 14 Jun 2020 22:35:57 No.3671045 Report

Quoted By: >>3671107

>>3671043

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 Jun 2020 01:47:09 No.3671107 Report

Quoted By: >>3671237

>>3671043
>>3671045
Can you post the raws? I'd like to give it a shot at editing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 Jun 2020 10:12:55 No.3671237 Report

Quoted By: >>3671238

>>3671107
Sure
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZJGS4Qtac92-cNGouuqN1medCdZw5lrv/view?usp=sharing

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO test1test.jpg, 492KiB, 1000x1088

Anonymous Mon 15 Jun 2020 10:37:59 No.3671238 Report

Quoted By: >>3671715

>>3671237
Thanks, here is my take.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Eai-1NoU4AECHNB.jpg, 631KiB, 2048x1366

Anonymous Tue 16 Jun 2020 13:41:19 No.3671715 Report

Quoted By:

>>3671238
It's close, but not quite there yet. Reds are too saturated, and there's too many colours overall in the image.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jun 2020 13:46:12 No.3671722 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670052
Highlight 0
Shadow +100
White 0
Black +100

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jun 2020 14:03:46 No.3671734 Report

Quoted By: >>3671742

>>3670052
Crank up the gamma midpoint on levels so that the shadows are open and bright and it’s low contrast, then up the saturation.

Or possibly convert to Lab after that and work on a and b with unsharp mask on a high radius to hammer up colour locally.

Separating into low and high frequencies and boosting colour on one of them only as well possibly

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO example.jpg, 504KiB, 1000x1336

Anonymous Tue 16 Jun 2020 14:29:49 No.3671742 Report

Quoted By: >>3672017

>>3671734
all I did was slide the gamma to the left and crank up saturation

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Jun 2020 22:04:01 No.3671880 Report

Quoted By:

>>3670052
>>3670075
- contrast
+ shadows
+ saturation
and mess around with colors a bit
this guy didn't bracket or use any HDR techniques
most people are too lazy to do that. especially when he has a feed full of the same look, but different situations
he's made a preset he throws on all his photos

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO example2.jpg, 683KiB, 1000x1336

Anonymous Wed 17 Jun 2020 06:09:21 No.3672017 Report

Quoted By:

>>3671742
another

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

How are these done?