>>3682564Same here, still, I felt I am missing possibilities with the 6D. E.g. since its introduction, with the AF system missing cross type sensors and missing cover, missing wide covered auto tracking. Next with controls, too few buttons, something along direct AF selection via the dialpad, that Magic Lantern is able to fix. Meanwhile, with no longer keeping up with the processing latitude that RAW files can offer, especially when manipulating/correcting the files, very, very rarely resolution. More detailed settings around Auto-ISO, Auto-ISO during flash, limiting of ranges of exposure settings (not just Auto-ISO here). Useful Live View based on DualPixel AF. Maybe a bunch more I can't think of right now.
The 5D4 would address all of these points and would also add even extra stuff.
I currently assume that upgrading to the R6 instead of the 5D4 would also take all these points into account, but unlike the 5D4 would not be based on a mechanically complex AF system but solely on DualPixel AF, would not require any adjustment of my lenses, would add some mirrorless features, such as vastly improved auto tracking, if you will zebras and IBIS, but would lack shots per battery and perhaps a welcome increase in pixels.
I don't know what to make of the current DualPixel AF, I've never used it thoroughly, but I've seen circumstances on the M5, for example, that the 6D addressed a lot better on its center AF field.
For me the 5D4 is more the decision of reason, the R6 is for me more of a niche camera that adds icing on the cake of the now to me most important attributes, would maybe be more convenient to use, granted that DualPixel has improved at extreme cases over the M5.
I think both are really interesting, but the R6 yet has to prove itself, finally I'm not replacing the 6D and am in only for the second hand market.
If you don't feel bound to the EF system or even want to start with a new system in this field, you'll find more bang for the buck with the Sony A7 III.
