>>3684993The 60-600 really is a spectacular length when you consider the focal range it offers and to how sharp is is.
If you don't care about shallow depth of field you can take that lens and another wide angle zoom and you're set.
The biggest reason for a tele-zoom is the ability to find your target in the lower focal range and then zoom in.
The sigma 150-600 sport would be the better option for proper wildlife photography since it will be able to withstand the environment.
The contemporary version for less demanding scenarios, would also be the better option since it can be found for like 600-700usd used. Also light.
If it's all about sharpness, the primes are the obvious choice. But then again the sigmas are worthy of their hype because they are sharp compared to primes.
That's enough reddit autist-post from me for today.