>>3692418Ken doesn't know what he's doing, but neither do you if you think everyone is always aiming for "lowest ISO"
There are a load of reasons someone might choose 800 iso 1/100 SS over 200 iso and 1/500
The ability to freeze movement works both ways. Sometimes you can freeze motion *too much* and sterilize the image. 1/100 is more exciting to look at in sports than 1/500 is.
iso 800 vs iso 200 is an undetetectable difference on most modern cameras, and 800 is actually peak dynamic range if you happen to be shooting jpegs
This is something with youtube retards, content makers and content consumers, they think they know more than they do because all their knowledge is rooted in third person experiences.
Just use your camera. Turn off the youtube. It's not that hard.