>>3690947No U
If you can't backup that wide open shots of a fugly dog and random horse pics with shitty post processing is good without bringing my photography into this than you've lost the argument.
All his photograph are technically right but they just don't say anything.
He's a youtube photographer, all of his pics are to please his impressionable audience and you've taken it hook line and sinker
>>3690947Good example here. Nice lighting, technically correct framing but it's just a photo of a rider and horse, there's is nothing being said here.
>>3690964>The real reason to dislike him is he can single handedly make old cameras double in asking price on ebay.Doesn't matter none of them are worth buying anyway,
They won't take better images than any current camera being sold and they defiantly won't make you a better photographer, it's all just gearfaggotry.
