>>3699797>>3699800headache inducing
>>3699805why would you not have your model stand in the well lit area? It's obvious you pulled shadows and had to dull highlights in post. Could've been really great but now it is just a flat image with a good idea.
>>3700704Nice big boy, but don't think you captured the true power this building is putting off. The cut off semi-circle is hurting.
>>3701896This is a very cool building caught on a temperate day. Good job on your first. I would crop it to atone to the rule-of-thirds a bit more.
>>3701902This is nice, but I wish the slit windows across the bottom right were either clone stamped or just cut.
>>3703511Idk if I buy all the hype on this one. It is very solid, but I think your (
>>3703509) picture is getting a bit underrated here.
>>3703513Should have moved 8 steps to the left to get the building out of the way... Replied mostly because I want to know where this is so I can climb it.
>>3703828I like the repetition in this picture.
>>3705743Looks like CGI. Kinda cool tho.
>>3706388This is very interesting to my eyes. It really needs a nice crop though.
>>3707935Nailed the DoF. Comp seems ok, dynamic range a lil wack. But Good pic overall.
>>3708676That is probably the best one I've seen in this thread. Perfectly angled my guy way to take advantage of an opportunity.
>>3709336I like where you were going with this. Might have needed a narrow ap.
>>3711720>>3711721>>3711724Pretty sure I've seen these same 3 shots posted in numerous threads.
>>3725143Cool and clear. But this is not Architecture.
>>3734951Decent framing.
>>3737070This building is sick, but that pic kinda grainy.
>>3739488Slick
After all those criticisms I bet your goofy ass expected some good Arc pics out of me, huh? Well guess what? You duped yourself, pal. However, I was depressed under a bridge the other day so you get this pile of golden hour highlights and non-artistic darks. Looking for some mid tones? Ha. Good luck.
