>>3708755showed many times all over the /p/. it's not much to show, but still
>>3708757yeah, one guy who work with me shooting with olympus (also the reason i hate m43, cause i know too much about this system, and how he is suffereing every time he need to colorgrade and banding appearing with noise at ISO800, literally picrelated it's how the sky looking on m43 after deep colorgrade) and he is printing. but he always have a problems with it. not enough sensor size to produce something bigger than 50cm with decent quality. and usual print is 60x90cm (you can recalculate it to american system youself). i don't posting bad things about olympus for past two years here just beacuse i hate logo or something. i worked with stuff from olympus A LOT and this is awfull experience in terms of everything. but yes, as you said here it's
>fun and easy to useso it's for sure good for hobby toy-system. but when we talking about serious photography is a pain cause
>fun and easy to useis an opposite of professional. all professional gear is hard to use and heavy comparing to olympus, and there is nothing fun in it. but still, it's produce HIGH QUALITY images with nice ISO and DR which is pleasure to use, colorgrade or print, while using RAWs from olympus is ethernal pain when we starting to talking about serious work
that's the reason less than ~1% percent of professionals using olympus. it's suitable for some kind of works but in most cases it's complete pain
