>>3712767>>3712768hello, it's that russian who made this paste here. it's of course hilarious sound out of the context, and i need to say that m43 is for sure DO HAVE IT'S NICHE and it's very cool cameras for it's purpose.
for some situations m43 is ultraoptimal choice. the problem with m43 that it's very niche system. it's FOR SURE SUITABLE for many ocassions. and it's DOES HAVE PLACE TO BE
but some m43 fanatics (i can't use other word, it's literally fanatics) used to advise to buy m43 to everybody while it's only ~2-3% of ocassions where m43 is comlete suitable overall in terms of photography in general. so they agressively suggest to buy m43 to everyone even when m43 is worst option ever
this paste was made in context of discussion when some of them here (you all know them perfectly) insistently made statements that you everybody need m43 and nobody need any other system ever while it's complete lie
in some ocassions the only right choise is m43
in some ocassions the only right choise is apsc
in some ocassions the only right choise is fullframe
in some ocassions the only right choise is DSLR
in some ocassions the only right choise is mirrorless
don't make your mind prejudiced
every system have it's place to be. every system is good for some purpose. just when some m43 fanatic tells you that m43 is good for everything - it's complete lie
for an example street night photography. it's the niche where only fullframe have place to be and apsc slightly suitable while m43 is NOT SUITABLE AT ALL
cheers americans. i'm drunk and go to chill
have a nice weekend
