>>3717197Standard. Nothing exciting. Gotta eek out that bit of personality to get the good shots. Props for approaching and engaging. Now get better at putting people at ease / knowing when to click the shutter.
>>3717202Not sure I'm a fan of shooting photos with this type of background. It implies that guy just came out of the sex shop...which maybe he doesn't want people to know or maybe didn't even come out of at all. As a photographer you can load scenes with all kinds of persuasive dialogues. Be careful.
>>3717202Could be fun. Background is a mess. Foreground/background relationships can really tie photos together.
>>3717203Whole right side is pointless. Wack composition.
>>3717206Kind of boring. Would be WAY more powerful as a diptych with a second shot of him attempting the kickflip. Create a story.
>>3717209Seen this 100million times.
>>3717210Not sure what the wide angle and looseness is doing. Only the bottom 20% corner of the photo is interesting...and even there you have some people cut off at frame edge. Sloppy.
>>3717212The guy is more interesting than the dogs. Stop down your lens.
>>3717213Interesting graphic organization. If there was something happening between the guy inside and the guy outside that would've ben awesome. Then you have this barrier between them but it appears they can still interact. It creates interest within the photo.
>>3717351Boring.
>>3717459Could be way more abstract and interesting composition wise.
>>3717462Could work in a set. Does absolutely nothing alone.
>>3717477Not that interesting.
>>3717554Not interesting and all of the bright background competes with the bird, giving it less prominence despite your shallow DoF.
>>3717572Weird photo. Not really into it. Seems something is happening but I'm only getting half the story...and half the story isn't interesting enough.
>>3717573Low effort mask photo. Anyone in a city with a phone could go take this exact shot right now.
