>>3719842>Everyone's work is derivative isi. There is no need to get upset with that guy calling you out on it. It's not like he had some fantastic original concept to throw in your face.There's a reason your greentext isn't a direct quote, because I was quite literally naming additional influences that feature prominently in my work going back further than Christenberry.
I talk about art and influences all the time, the same cannot be said for you. You simp after strippers dreaming that you're a boudoir photographer while plastering the worst watermark I've ever seen in the corner of your shots.
We are not the same, buddy.
>The fact that you always question someone's intelligence when they try to critique you grates on me. It's why I never personally engage with you in your threads.Nobody cares if the Basedbeard Son of St Louis posts in my threads or not, retard
>It just makes you look like a cunt isi. Especially when you explain in from your perceived high horse of intellectual superiority. It comes off as condescendtion.I am indeed being condescending to you, you're a bit slow on the uptake maybe tho
>You're fucking insufferable when you behave like this. Saccharine faux-civility on 4chan of all websites in the year 2020 is far more insufferable than I could ever play to be
>I find your work decent but nowhere near at the level you pretend it is. I don't pretend any level, I just post it and explain my thought processes and influences.
>That's not to say my work is any better because it isn't, but you're standing on a house of cards.The fact you even think of things in terms like "better" or "worse" is indicative of why anyone that actually likes to discuss art would act condescending towards you.
