/p/ - Photography » Thread #3718329

[71 / 8 / ?]

397KiB, 1080x827, Screenshot_20200831-092321_Chrome.jpg

Are Sony colours really that bad?

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 08:35:15 No.3718329 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3718335 >>3718340 >>3718376 >>3718400 >>3718405 >>3718477 >>3718598 >>3718932 >>3718938 >>3719054 >>3719209

Damn, I kinda wanted to get an A7 too...

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 08:51:26 No.3718331 Report

Quoted By: >>3718340 >>3718369 >>3718938

oh no my sooc jpegs

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 08:59:35 No.3718335 Report

Quoted By: >>3718340 >>3718938

>>3718329
there's a green tint to them
which can ruin all of your photos
unless you remember that you should be shooting in raw and fixing it is no hassle at all

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 09:14:31 No.3718340 Report

Quoted By: >>3718369 >>3718938

>>3718335
>>3718331
>>3718329
>Not shooting Real RAW™

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:02:00 No.3718367 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

>oh no my fake thot dyed hair doesn't show up

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:02:33 No.3718369 Report

Quoted By: >>3718386 >>3718938

>>3718331
>>3718340
RAW images are also influenced by the camera make.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:04:46 No.3718376 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

>>3718329
yes. this will fuck raw as well

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:09:48 No.3718386 Report

Quoted By: >>3718388 >>3718390 >>3718938

>>3718369
Yes, and?
Are you trying to claim that there's not enough latitude in the RAWs to correct for the tint?

Folk claims Sonyiggers are spec sheet warriors (they are honestly) but then reply with m-muh color science

That's just as bad. Stupid niggers on both sides, just shoot photos.
Board needs more pentax posters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:11:31 No.3718388 Report

Quoted By: >>3718391 >>3718938

>>3718386
What the fuck are you on about? I personally wouldn't prefer to color correct every fucking photo I take.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:14:20 No.3718390 Report

Quoted By: >>3718391 >>3718891 >>3718938

>>3718386
Yellow is overexposed. It's well known sony problem that CAN'T be fixed with a raw file. Only correction is underexposing, then you get even worse problem, false colours...

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:16:19 No.3718391 Report

Quoted By: >>3718392 >>3718417 >>3718938

>>3718388
If you wish to only shoot SOOC jpegs then simply purchase a camera that's not a Sony.

Likewise if the RAW workflow interests you, Sony may offer more benefits compared to other brands.

You can batch edit your photos on import as well.

>>3718390
Again, simply do not purchase a Sony camera if this is an issue for you. If it's a well known problem you don't need to make threads about it.

Take pictures with whichever tool you wish, don't hate on tools you're never going to use just because they don't suit your workflow.

Such inane folk

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO snoy.jpg, 391KiB, 1624x1030

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:18:15 No.3718392 Report

Quoted By: >>3718395 >>3718654 >>3718938

>>3718391
>don't complain just cumsume!

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:21:41 No.3718395 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

>>3718392
I'm not telling you to consume Sony though

Why would I complain about Sony as a Canon shooter. I'll complain about Canon if I feel the need for it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:26:50 No.3718397 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

I wouldn't mind using Sony cameras. After white balancing and colour balancing in lightroom you can't tell the difference between Canon, Nikon and Sony.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 122A61A1-DF0A-4750-8A24-89F83C92 (...).jpg, 966KiB, 1668x916

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:27:04 No.3718398 Report

Quoted By: >>3718502 >>3718725 >>3718938

https://youtu.be/EMfCDujQywY

When cameras are labelled most people pick Canon as best, and down rate Sony and Fuji. It’s just angry brand loyalists. When they’re not labelled (blind test) they pick Sony and Fuji (get along for two minutes you fags) as the best and down rate Canon and Nikon.

If you’re shooting sooc JPEG, you should also be setting wb as well as setting a specific profile.

>muh Canon colour science
Canon has the overall most users and the highest brand loyalty. It’s just confirmation bias.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:28:12 No.3718400 Report

Quoted By: >>3718401 >>3718938

>>3718329
jeez /p/ is awfully impressionable, left pic of obviously better but tell them it doesn't and they all jump on board

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO canonvsony.jpg, 218KiB, 1080x827

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:36:56 No.3718401 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

>>3718400
You're going about it all wrong, all you have to do is pic related and then be like
>AHAHAHAHA look at the SNOY
>Muh amazing Canon tonality and colour science™

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 10:48:33 No.3718405 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

>>3718329
I don't really care about the colors if I don't find the photo interesting, and I don't find that particular image all that interesting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 11:13:17 No.3718414 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

Wait so are sonyggers jewing people out of colour or are the non-sonybros doing it?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1567709775229.jpg, 22KiB, 480x360

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 11:15:01 No.3718417 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

>sonyggers don't even have real colours
oh me oh my

>>3718391
DESPERATE damage control.

the word is out, and i now have a New Weapon Against You

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 11:21:16 No.3718424 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

The right image has slightly less saturated colors. You could make the right image look like the left image and vice versa.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 11:28:05 No.3718430 Report

Quoted By: >>3718938

but the sony looks better lol

look at her hair on the left, fucked up color

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 12:47:22 No.3718465 Report

Quoted By: >>3718498 >>3718938

I don't get it
Left looks like it has more contrast and vibrancy, Right looks too faded and soft on the skin.
Sigma is shit at tonalities anyway and the girl has tinted hair which she moved from photo to photo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 13:13:36 No.3718477 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718329
Left looks like she's been through the Rockwelliser

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:04:46 No.3718498 Report

Quoted By: >>3718501 >>3718507

>>3718465
It's too strong yellow/red tint that's distracting eyes from the face. Overly saturated yellow on the dress, unnatural highlights of the hair, weird red tint of the background.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:12:00 No.3718501 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718498
>distracting eyes from the face
Not for me at least, there's no other subject. Her eyes and blemishes are out of focus in both anyways.
>Overly saturated yellow on the dress
I agree, too strong.
>unnatural highlights of the hair
Her hair is shit in both images, typical ho fashion.
>weird red tint of the background
Dimmed lights from probably a restaurant or cafe.
I would say the processing of Sony is much more aggressive than Canon's but i prefer image in the left for direct publishing. The comparison is pretty poor due to many differences between both situations, they even look like different lenses rather than cameras because of the dumb photog.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:15:00 No.3718502 Report

Quoted By: >>3718507

>>3718398
I remember when the DPreview guys did the exact same thing and got the opposite results. Ignore brands, test and buy whatever you want.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:20:21 No.3718507 Report

Quoted By: >>3718513 >>3718514 >>3718732

>>3718498
>The yellow on her dress is oversaturated

Says the person with zero clue on what the dress should look like. LOL!

fwiw, the much greater contrast and clarity in the Sony shot is much nicer.

>>3718502
Sick citation bro.

But Sony have proven themselves to objectively have more accurate colours too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:24:55 No.3718510 Report

Quoted By:

>2020
>Not shooting medium format

Yikes

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:28:56 No.3718513 Report

Quoted By: >>3718521

>>3718507
>Says the person with zero clue on what the dress should look like. LOL!

Neon yellow does not happen naturally.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:31:08 No.3718514 Report

Quoted By: >>3718521

>>3718507
>Sony ... have more accurate colours
Gonna need a [cite] on that claim.
>pdnonline.com/gear/cameras/the-best-cameras-for-color-reproduction-ranked/
>and the orig item that op pic sourced from
>petapixel.com/2018/10/09/is-sonys-color-science-really-that-bad/

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 14:45:45 No.3718521 Report

Quoted By: >>3718546 >>3718663

>>3718513
>jumpers are natural objects
yikes
>neon yellow does not happen naturally
Someones never pissed after taking too many b vitamins...

>>3718514
>shows Sony having the most accurate colour of any full frame camera

Thanks bro

>show's article from a canon fanboi where his opinion is that canon is better than sony and offers no objective measurements

nice one, look how canon-cucked this guy is https://fstoppers.com/profile/32312/articles

LMAO

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 15:16:06 No.3718546 Report

Quoted By: >>3718667

>>3718521
are b vitamins naturally occurring?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 16:49:45 No.3718598 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718329

What are you on about? I much prefer the left one.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 17:32:20 No.3718628 Report

Quoted By:

>pixel peeping at 2 jpgs that can be corrected instantly

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 18:26:57 No.3718654 Report

Quoted By: >>3718658

>>3718392
why is the a7sIII logo edited in

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 18:40:09 No.3718658 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718654
Because he can't afford one kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 18:52:58 No.3718663 Report

Quoted By: >>3718682

>>3718521
>>shows Sony having the worst color.
your retardation is amazing. those links specifically point out how bad sony is at color science. but you shill on, fucknugget. no one believes in sony like they pay you to.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 18:56:58 No.3718667 Report

Quoted By: >>3718682

>>3718546
yes
vitamins -> vital amins as in the bases of proteins which we find in any living thing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 19:25:39 No.3718682 Report

Quoted By: >>3718732

>>3718663
the pdnonline link shows sony having the most accurate color of any full frame camera.

>>3718667
Don't be surprised, anons diet doesn't vary from nuggies and fries, the stupid greasy fuck.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 21:02:04 No.3718725 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718398
This video is absolute shit. The pictures are complete garbage. Very poor test.

And as if I'm not going to use "portrait" or "vivid" setting in my Canon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 21:23:21 No.3718732 Report

Quoted By: >>3718769

>>3718682
>any full frame
moving goalposts again?
ff was not the claim... color accuracy was. >>3718507 remember?
care to try again, shill?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 23:00:39 No.3718769 Report

Quoted By: >>3718775 >>3719077

>>3718732
>Sony colours are bad because the only camera that does better is the ricoh GR >:(

you're coming across as a fucking retard pal.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 23:06:16 No.3718775 Report

Quoted By: >>3718776

>>3718769
>Pal
Only cunts and Irish say """pal""" so which are you?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 31 Aug 2020 23:08:55 No.3718776 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718775
>wahhhh i don't like the words you use >:(

chin-up champ, you've got much bigger things in your life you should be upset over.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 03:06:26 No.3718891 Report

Quoted By: >>3719012

>>3718390
>Yellow is overexposed. It's well known sony problem that CAN'T be fixed with a raw file.
Wait... why?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 04:49:48 No.3718932 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718329
Learn to edit

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO jcl8tsh00u941.jpg, 2MiB, 2018x1500

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 05:24:14 No.3718938 Report

Quoted By: >>3718959 >>3719581

>>3718329
>>3718331
>>3718335
>>3718340
>>3718367
>>3718369
>>3718376
>>3718386
>>3718388
>>3718390
>>3718391
>>3718392
>>3718395
>>3718397
>>3718398
>>3718400
>>3718401
>>3718405
>>3718414
>>3718417
>>3718424
>>3718430
>>3718465
How good is the A7iii for pulling fashion stills from 4K video shot in a studio? And how good is the Nikon Z6 at the same thing? And how good is whatever I'm not mentioning (HAS to be full frame.) I shoot video instead of stills because I don't like praying and spraying when hunting for the decisive moment.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO laughing.jpg, 51KiB, 634x318

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 06:17:31 No.3718959 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718938
>fashion stills from 4K video shot in a studio
>I shoot video instead of stills because I don't like praying and spraying when hunting for the decisive moment

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 09:39:32 No.3719012 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718891
Because anon is chatting bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 12:35:15 No.3719054 Report

Quoted By: >>3719064

>>3718329
I honestly can’t tell the difference between those two pictures

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 13:31:29 No.3719064 Report

Quoted By: >>3719476

>>3719054
the state of /p/

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 14:52:45 No.3719077 Report

Quoted By: >>3719100

>>3718769
>you're coming across as a fucking retard pal.
its your ancestors who were fucking retards (incest, perhaps?), thus your existence.
>moron still cant cite anything to support moronic sperging. 'reeeeeeeeee' commencing.
>and NO ONE believes sony colors are 'teh best'
>anything else, knobgoblin? thought so.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 16:13:45 No.3719100 Report

Quoted By: >>3719153

>>3719077
>Still sperging out, still can't counter the fact that Sony has the most accurate colours in any professional system.

Womp womp.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 17:22:55 No.3719153 Report

Quoted By: >>3719177 >>3719209

>>3719100
It's widely accepted that sony overexposes by a quarter. Every image must be then brought back and this fucks up colours.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 17:51:25 No.3719177 Report

Quoted By: >>3719410

>>3719153
Lol, no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 18:48:49 No.3719209 Report

Quoted By: >>3719270

>>3719153
dude, you've proof right in this thread >>3718329

Sony overexposes for dynamic range charts, then fucks up colours.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 20:49:24 No.3719270 Report

Quoted By: >>3719276

>>3719209

Can't you change that in the camera settings? Or do you have to set the exposure compensation to -1/4 or -1/3?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 20:53:54 No.3719276 Report

Quoted By: >>3719431

>>3719270
Neither, it's baked in. Shooting -0.3 ev will already effect colours. It's not HUGE deal, but it's fun jabbing snoyi users with it, since it definitely is there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 01 Sep 2020 23:36:18 No.3719384 Report

Quoted By: >>3719436

Portra got skin tones right over 20 years ago with a strip of plastic, why is it so hard for digi.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 00:20:25 No.3719410 Report

Quoted By:

>>3719177
lol, fuck you.
>sonyfags never change (unless it's gender.related)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO SonyStripes.jpg, 521KiB, 1577x1343

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 00:57:46 No.3719431 Report

Quoted By: >>3720474

>>3719276
you can actually SEE the sony.quality
>www.dpreview.com/news/6974141509/sony-striping-heres-the-fix
>you'd think sony's lossy-RAW compression would hide their flaw; but no, they cant even screw that up properly

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 01:39:58 No.3719436 Report

Quoted By:

>>3719384
Because film is logarithmic and digital is linear.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 03:16:09 No.3719450 Report

Quoted By: >>3719454

Sonybros... Help...

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 03:28:23 No.3719454 Report

Quoted By: >>3719560

>>3719450
I'm just waiting for the release of the Sony A7C lineup desu. At least make it 1.5k USD for the body, not 2k.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 04:58:33 No.3719476 Report

Quoted By: >>3719560

>>3719064
It was just my iPhone, I saw it on a desktop when I got home from work and I see the difference. The Sony one looks better.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 08:08:22 No.3719560 Report

Quoted By: >>3719587 >>3720489

>>3719454
I heard from a friend in the industry it's going under $1k

>>3719476
Sony looks much better to me, more colour depth and greater contrast, the canon has assfucked the yellows into more of an off gray.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 08:34:24 No.3719581 Report

Quoted By:

>>3718938
lol what the fuck anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Sep 2020 08:52:18 No.3719587 Report

Quoted By:

>>3719560
>I heard from a friend in the industry it's going under $1k

>Sony looks much better to me,

lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Sep 2020 18:13:02 No.3720474 Report

Quoted By:

>>3719431
what the fuck is that

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Sep 2020 18:26:30 No.3720489 Report

Quoted By:

>>3719560
>Sony
>Full frame
>Under 1k
That'll be the day anon.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Are Sony colours really that bad?