>>3742052>I havent tried it personallyI have used both a Z6 and a A7III, the Nikon surpasses it (it should after so much time in advantage) but in terms of the R or S series there's no competition, the A7RIV is a monster that the Z7 can barely side with in terms of AF speed and output volume but does fight well against the R5, which i honestly just used inside the store.
If you haven't touched them, why so sure about Canon dusting Nikon? youtube gives a good idea but in terms using them on the field some minor details become more vital while the big specs become sidelined. Nikon has bad battery life compared to the Canon but the controls and menus are not laggy, the Sony is a pain to use if you are using different types of shoot conditions but works well enough for hobby use, weight balance is pants on head retarded tho compared to Canon's more hefty camera.
I don't blame you for going with the zoomer trend that Nikon is an old company and that the Canon is on par with Sony just because they have 8k (which overheats and has erratic scene detection AF, same with burst shooting for 5 minutes) but to me it looks more like Canon's marketing team and Nikon's strained brand loyalty fighting for the hybrid weeding shooter second place while Sony is comfortably first via brute tech power, bidding its time until either Nikon starts using their mount and engineering potential or Canon starts selling shitty mirrorless crops with crappy pancakes for 500 bucks to the third world thus winning market share and potential future users who only know their brand.
At the end of the day that's what it is, the zoomer vlogger/weeding dog market, the money is there but for actual photography, which doesn't seem to be making much money yet has a loyal userbase, the cameras are different and i don't see Sony being better than Nikon OR Canon as all its advantages are for video.
