/p/ - Photography » Thread #3743823

[59 / 18 / ?]

10KiB, 273x355, 71M95bJonNL._AC_SY355_.jpg

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:16:57 No.3743823 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3743909 >>3743995 >>3744075 >>3744935 >>3744978 >>3744980

Talk me out of it /p.

Loved my 85 1.4 Planer on film and for early digital but sold it

Now I can afford the very best but hesitate for some reason.

Still love my 28 2.0 and use it on my 6D II

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:21:00 No.3743824 Report

Quoted By: >>3743825

get all 4 otus
they're great

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:23:23 No.3743825 Report

Quoted By: >>3743826

>>3743824
I could do that but I think I would hate myself.

I could trim a bunch of old valuable stuff out

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:24:37 No.3743826 Report

Quoted By: >>3743828

>>3743825
do it

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:30:28 No.3743828 Report

Quoted By: >>3743830

>>3743826
I already have an 85 1.2 50th and a 28mm 2.0. I dont use a 50 at all and the 100? A bad joke. I like 2 out of the 4 lenses

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:33:01 No.3743830 Report

Quoted By: >>3743831 >>3743837 >>3743839

>>3743828
the 55 and the 100 are fantastic
also the 85 1.2 is an absolute joke in comparison

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:33:54 No.3743831 Report

Quoted By: >>3743834

>>3743830
Got any pictures using those two?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:35:38 No.3743834 Report

Quoted By: >>3743845 >>3744079

>>3743831
sure

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:37:57 No.3743837 Report

Quoted By:

>>3743830
Fuck a gut has a set of the 28 55 and 85 on fleabay for 9.5k

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 21:42:50 No.3743839 Report

Quoted By:

>>3743830
PS Honestly, I have no real reason to hate the 100mm. Used one on my Hasselblad for decades, great lens.

I think I've become my own worst enemy, a lens snob who poo poos great equipment because I don't fit into a pattern

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 16 Oct 2020 22:04:08 No.3743845 Report

Quoted By:

>>3743834
If you please.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0595-large.jpg, 1MiB, 1440x1080

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 00:09:08 No.3743901 Report

Quoted By: >>3744096 >>3744127 >>3745000

At nearly $4000, I would hesitate too. If you're still reluctant even with the extra money, then their Milvus line is nearly on-par in quality at only a praction of the price (pic is the Milvus 50m).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 00:25:41 No.3743909 Report

Quoted By:

>>3743823
BUY IT
It won't have any effect on your photography but it will make you feel better about yourself for a day or two.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 03:49:26 No.3743995 Report

Quoted By: >>3744036

>>3743823
if you don't make enough money from photography to be able to afford this lens without doubt, then you don't need to buy this lens, simples

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 05:05:31 No.3744036 Report

Quoted By: >>3744044

>>3743995
Dont need to worry about that, 6 figure inheritance.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 05:13:24 No.3744044 Report

Quoted By: >>3744127

>>3744036
yet here you are, worrying about it instead of buying and taking photos with it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 06:10:23 No.3744075 Report

Quoted By: >>3744127

>>3743823
Gosh, didn't you just buy that Leica the other day? I am awed by your fabulous wealth, I want to have your babies.

Alas, it will probably too lowly for you but at least turn on your trip so that I may worship you more efficiently.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 06:35:42 No.3744079 Report

Quoted By:

>>3743834
Ah yes the nophoto

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO A7R02729FM3aPanFMilvus.jpg, 1MiB, 1429x2048

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 07:50:34 No.3744096 Report

Quoted By: >>3744107

>>3743901
2nding, my milvus 50/1.4 is the business

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 07:54:58 No.3744098 Report

Quoted By:

your shitty photos are not worth the lens

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 08:20:19 No.3744107 Report

Quoted By:

>>3744096
too bad you missed focus

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 17 Oct 2020 09:51:07 No.3744127 Report

Quoted By:

>>3744044
Curious about how good it is compared to the mediocre 24 105 Canon

>>3744075

Only have a 10x40 BAs by them

>>3743901
Wondered about that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 06:20:52 No.3744935 Report

Quoted By: >>3745174

>>3743823
Do it, anything zeiss is sure buy.
With other 3rd makers you have to do research, but zeiss has never let me down.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 08:51:05 No.3744975 Report

Quoted By: >>3745031

I have the Milvus in a 50 macro and the classic planar-T for 85 portrait and they are both fantastic lenses. The main difference between the older and the Milvus is just the improved ergonomics and the water proofing, so anyone on a budget should look at the classic planar-T. Ziess have a nice cinematic feel I really like that suits my work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 09:04:49 No.3744978 Report

Quoted By:

>>3743823
I got the FE 85mm 1.8 and never looked back. That Otus is ugly as hell. Consider the alternatives, the GM, the 85 1.8, the Sigma 85mm 1.4, the Samyang 85mm 1.4. Id pick the new Sigma 85mm 1.4 over the Otus, but desu Id want a lighter lens (Otus is similar weight).

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 09:11:17 No.3744980 Report

Quoted By: >>3744994

>>3743823
Its ugly, and heavy. And other lenses are better, the GM, the new Sigma Art (also heavy). Hell, you could take the Canon 85mm f/1.2 at that weight. I might even take the Samyang 85mm 1.4 AF for EF over that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 10:19:59 No.3744994 Report

Quoted By: >>3744996 >>3744998

>>3744980
Lift some weights you lanklet. I've been using heavier lenses than those primes for years and never had issue with weight or health. But that's to be expected from typical 4chan nophoto user.

vv86

vv86 Mon 19 Oct 2020 11:02:55 No.3744996 Report

Quoted By:

>>3744994
I don't think these nophotos have ever lifted a nice medium format camera either. Those motherfuckers get heavy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 11:04:20 No.3744998 Report

Quoted By:

>>3744994
Nice photo, nophoto

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 9D594272-DB2D-47CB-B026-6456BEDB (...).jpg, 1MiB, 1125x1821

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 11:32:58 No.3745000 Report

Quoted By: >>3745002 >>3745029 >>3745130

>>3743901
So this is the power of meme lenses...

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 11:40:53 No.3745002 Report

Quoted By: >>3745003

>>3745000
You dont understand. You wouldn't have been make this shot with a less expensive lens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 11:54:05 No.3745003 Report

Quoted By:

>>3745002
I know, im just coping, seething, nophotoing

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO happeh.jpg, 276KiB, 600x800

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 14:40:19 No.3745029 Report

Quoted By: >>3745030

>>3745000
>out-of-focus area is blurry

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 14:43:01 No.3745030 Report

Quoted By: >>3745037

>>3745029
>chromatic aberration
>in the middle of the fucking frame
you got cucked, just admit it

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2766-large.jpg, 906KiB, 1080x1620

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 14:43:26 No.3745031 Report

Quoted By:

>>3744975
The Planar-T 85mm is great.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2149-large.jpg, 1MiB, 1080x1620

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 14:53:04 No.3745037 Report

Quoted By: >>3745039 >>3745055

>>3745030
There is longitudinal chromatic aberration when wide open, but I blame my color editing for bringing it out like that. This >3735408 is how it looks fully closed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 14:54:10 No.3745039 Report

Quoted By:

>>3745037
Meant >>3735408

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 15:18:15 No.3745055 Report

Quoted By: >>3745058

>>3745037
and i dont have that problem with my shit ef 24-105 that i bought for 200 euros. you got meme'd hard

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 15:37:26 No.3745058 Report

Quoted By:

>>3745055
Any recommendations for a lens with similar characteristics to mine without the CA? If not, I guess I should finally start using the included correction profile.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 101742382_145336273833434_577637 (...).jpg, 178KiB, 1280x853

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 16:35:30 No.3745083 Report

Quoted By: >>3745111

Bumping with more Memevus. Missed focus because he turned his head.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 17:24:23 No.3745111 Report

Quoted By: >>3745136

>>3745083
>Missed focus because he turned his head
Oh god lmao

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_1084-large.jpg, 1MiB, 1080x1620

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 17:42:21 No.3745120 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO sticc1.jpg, 561KiB, 1280x1573

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 17:44:16 No.3745122 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2213-large.jpg, 3MiB, 1620x1080

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 17:54:25 No.3745126 Report

Quoted By: >>3745142

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC06507.jpg, 196KiB, 800x561

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 18:03:29 No.3745130 Report

Quoted By: >>3745141

>>3745000
Yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 18:23:00 No.3745136 Report

Quoted By: >>3745141

>>3745111
Bro this is too funny he has to keep posting

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO sticc2~2.jpg, 357KiB, 1280x853

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 18:33:30 No.3745141 Report

Quoted By:

>>3745130
That's pretty bad. Even mine never fringed like that in the worst conditions.
>>3745136
I'm sorry. Here's another.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 18:34:20 No.3745142 Report

Quoted By: >>3745160

>>3745126
This is what $7000 gets you

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 19:01:30 No.3745160 Report

Quoted By: >>3745173

>>3745142
>$750 lens + $1350 body = $7000

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 19:16:09 No.3745173 Report

Quoted By:

>>3745160
yeah

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20200308-DSC04590.jpg, 713KiB, 1831x1030

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 19:16:58 No.3745174 Report

Quoted By: >>3745214

>>3744935
This. My 50mm Ultron is my favorite.
First Zeiss lens designed on a computer, rare concave front lens, awesome rendering and sharpness, god-like handling (but shit itself with flares + B-50 filter).

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_3293-large.jpg, 1MiB, 1440x1080

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 20:16:20 No.3745202 Report

Quoted By: >>3745220

Planar T* 85mm

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 20:30:06 No.3745211 Report

Quoted By:

Fuck Zeiss really got over on these guys

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 20:38:30 No.3745214 Report

Quoted By: >>3745220

>>3745174
>but shit itself with flares + B-50 filter
So... don’t use it outdoors basically?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20200809-DSC07186.jpg, 889KiB, 1831x1030

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 20:49:12 No.3745220 Report

Quoted By: >>3745245

>>3745214
It's not THAT bad. But with a bright sun in the frame, you'll surely get a rainbow across the picture.
Shame that the prices have skyrocketed to +300$.
>>3745202
Niiiice.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2408-large.jpg, 1MiB, 1620x1080

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 22:11:55 No.3745245 Report

Quoted By:

>>3745220
Thank you. Let's get some positivity in here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 19 Oct 2020 22:43:35 No.3745265 Report

Quoted By: >>3745367

Anyone got examples of using an Otus / Milvus on film?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Oct 2020 00:56:33 No.3745367 Report

Quoted By:

>>3745265
Found some results on Flickr.
https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=Zeiss%20otus%20film

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_1777-large.jpg, 715KiB, 1620x1080

Anonymous Wed 21 Oct 2020 05:46:07 No.3746158 Report

Quoted By:

Friendly bump. Milvus 50mm f/1.4

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches