>>3760268I was wondering if you would bump this thread, as you'd need to look at the EXIF to know it was taken with a Fuji and there's no white border dog whistles for you to know you should bump it. Are you searching for Fuji in the archives? Of all the threads you bumped this is the outlier as it shows talent and interesting photography.
Funny how you say that and selectively bump only the Fuji photo threads (when they have easily the worst pics of all photo threads).
Eggy? No way, he shoots a Pentax.
Subaru guy? No way, he shoots a Nikon full frame.
Phone photographer? No way, he shoots with an iPhone 7, certainly not a Fuji.
Bird shooter? No way, he shoots a Sony.
Guy asking for advice on improving his photos he's asked to overcook? Phew, didn't even post EXIF, why bother bumping.
Selective color guy? Canon M50, that's haram.
Leaf anon? Nikon D3300, no way you're going to bump something like that.
Digishit thread? As if you'd waste time on someone who shoots with a Konica Minolta from the 2000s
Military photo thread? Heh, those Canon faggots and their 1D X fuckhuge cameras.
You pretend you're an anti-gearfag but you're actually the worst kind of gearfag, a brandfag who thinks a turd taken with a Fuji is good because of the camera that took it.
