>>3753751Very super smooth B&W. I dig it. Try fewer photos of buildings with lights on (I know not much else in Montreal) or B&W film, it captures light differently. Go down to the river, or if you have the time like VT or NY or something.
>>3753758Goofy, and you. I appreciate it.
>>3753836That bottom row is hella nice. You have a nice aesthetic, I think you just need to find subjects that work better with you. I would get out to some local conifer forests, if I were you, try some rainy-morning shoots there.
>>3753939#nightlights
>>3755039Oof, this has a look I like; some of this is like what I would expect to see if I stillframed a documentary shot in a third-world country. Good use of light and shadow.
>>3755954Very slice-of-lifey. I don't dig it as a concept but I dig how you pull it off. What are you shooting with for glass, a 50mm? I'd say if you tried with a slightly-wider angle (maybe a 45mm or 40mm) you might get some nice variability in what you can catch, but it'll still look very POV.
>>3753765Just based on this, the only one I like is the one with the plant, but I take it you like repetitive patterns? Please read up on the math of biological systems, I think you may find more patterns out there than you know of, and you will appreciate the beauty of more complicated things than buildings.
>>3753800Cinematographic. Is that your gf? Why do you only have one model. I'd like to see what you do with a variety of models.
>>3753810Certainly an good boi/grl.
Mine is @ethan.staats; mostly doing a shit job documenting snakes lately, but there are a few shots where I was actually trying mixed in; film, vintage glass, underwater, outside and nature.
