>>3754554>sony zoom lens is sharper than every fuji primeThis is true, presuming the Sony is full frame, no fuji prime has 50% greater lp/mm than full frame Sony zooms, which it would need to beat it, crop sensors are 16mm high, ff are 24mm high. You're welcome to try and prove me wrong.
>can't adapt EF lensesCan't adapt EF lenses *well*, the af on even the best fuji ef adapters is really poor compared to Nikon and Sony's EF adapters. Uncle Ken has done an article on this.
>fuji has no third party af lensesThis was true until very recently, and now Viltrox have 4 lenses available, still no word from samyang, sigma, tamron, etc.
>fuji has worms in photosMaybe not natively, but if you want to use the most popular editing software (who don't officially support fuji), then there are issues with the standard sharpening algortihm. Workarounds have been considered, but they are in no way as good as the results as using a standard bayer CFA camera.
>>3754552It's not a brand war, fuji users get very upset over Sony cameras, Tony northrup highlighted this issue with his color science showdown and backed it up with data.
>A7RIV is unsuitable for daily useThis comes across like agenda posting, unless you're talking about the large file sizes, there is nothing about the A7RIV that makes it any more difficult to use day to day than any fuji, and the improved performance and larger variety of lenses available allow it to shoot in more conditions and with better specialisation for whatever type of shooting you want, if file size is an issue, the A7 range has the same MP count as fuji.
>>3754557The same as why every sony discussion is dogpiled by fuji fans, agenda posting. The important matter is can you back up your argument with reasoning or is there a lot of disingenuity; like the first person i replied to.
