>>3775666I've been looking at them.
The M50 ($1,088 at CameraPro) with kit lens looks good, but has the major issue that EOS M is a dead mount with the arrival of RF and provides no real upgrade path. Also a bit bulky.
Then you have Sony a6400 with kit lens ($1,400 at CameraPro). It has a tilting screen.
The Nikon Z50 ($1,499.95 at Ted's) with kit lens is an option too, but a bit bulky to carry around. Tilting screen too, but because Nikon isn't retarded like Sony the 180 degree movement is down so it doesn't conflict with the hotshoe.
Last minute addition:
Just saw the M6 Mark II with kit lens and EVF at Ted's for $1,699.95. That one is high end and together with the 90D is the highest resolution APS-C camera available today. It's as compact as the Sony but has no integrated EVF, you mount it on the hotshoe. Has a tilting screen just like the one on the Z50.
If you ever decide to do some long range photography it will put the Sony a7R IV out to pasture. It would be my first choice, but I'm interested in long range photography. It may not be the best for you.
If you go with Canon, consider getting the 22mm f/2. It's not very wide but it's nice to have. $237 at Camera Pro.
If you go with Sony, consider the 16mm f/2.8 pancake. On an APS-C camera it's a 24mm equivalent, great for street. $247 at Camera Pro.
Consider getting the EF adapter too, $133 at Camera Pro. Gives you access to the entire EF catalog which is very extensive and you can get lots of old glass.
Nikon doesn't offer anything affordable native to Z yet when it comes to wide primes but I suppose they will do eventually. The FTZ adapter is expensive too, over $400.
I didn't browse much at Digidirect because the site kept freezing my browser lol.
