>>3778856lol imagine buying a binned sensor without seeing overheating tests first
>>3778973Yeah they're just shallow, not small. But it's enough to fool fujifags.
>>3778768Both are good but honestly if the focus is video a mirrorless camera would be better. How about M6 II? The smart adapter by Canon is super cheap for a smart one and you get to use your EF/E-S lenses. I don't know your budget btw.
Don't get the fucking Fuji, even Sony is less miserable.
Another cool option and more future-proofed is BMPCC6K but it's like twice the price of the others or more. The GH series have a MFT sensor so you'll need a speedbooster adapter to see what an APS-C can see.