>>3779219lol, fashion peaked in the 00s
>>3779202what surprises me generally though is how "normal" these people look. as in, it's what I remember people in bongistan looking like when I was a child (which would have been around the time these were taken, I was born in 1996). although there's still the standard british awkwardness (which has been a thing since the 1800s or something)
I can't actually put my finger on when or how, but at some point everything changed. most people think it was this year, I disagree, that's just when the people upstairs fucked up by accelerating the change a bit too quickly and the masses started noticing something was amiss. as
>>3779299 said it wasn't 9/11 either. (((2008))) was a nothingburger. smartphones were still a novelty for most people up until about 2013, and even then they weren't particularly good and the batteries didn't last so there wasn't this incentive to stare at them all day. maybe around ~2015-17? I just don't know.
