>>3779560best one ITT
>>3779555soviet commieblockscape/10
>>3779556>>3779558not feeling these
>>3779565>>3779566>>3779567feels like camera test shots, no clear subject and the scene is too messy
>>3779569>>3779575i see what you're going for these are cliche but some people like that stuff
>>3779570>>3779572if you gonna take pictures of other people's art you should be adding something to it, otherwise its no different than taking a phone pic in a museum gallery
>>3779576not as good as
>>3779560 because there's less abstraction. The windows at the bottom take up too much space and distract, while your first pic they blend into a neat texture
>>3779581 is okay>>3779580>>3779597it looks like a tourist snapshot
>>3779589the pole in the middle is distracting otherwise it makes a nice stock photo
>>3779595meh i can see you're trying to frame something but the problem is there's no real subject to be framed, so the pic just falls flat
similar to
>>3779590 the subject (gravestone?) doesn't stand out enough to warrant the framing with the vignette
>>3779598i think this one would do better with tighter crop and better lighting. the bridge is the subject, but the wide angle framing with the willows makes the bridge feel small and insignificant, and not in a good way
>>3779600this one's got nice colors and tone
>>3779601>>3779602these nightscapes don't really have a subject
>>3779606Overall you've got a handful of nice pics and some with potential.
One thing i notice is a lot of pics don't have clear subject, seem to be taken for the sake of taking a photo; instead of having a subject that is worth taking a photo for, and then composing for that subject. If you work on finding out what your subject is, then the composition will come naturally, instead of trying to force compositions where there isn't a subject.
I think if you take the time to curate and decide what's a snapshot vs what's a keeper photo you'll see big improvement.
