>>3782316>I didn't say stars, I said groups of stars >:(Lol
>I don't think you've owned a cameraLol, I was merely showing that it's not just my opinion that you're wrong, but the conclusion of dozens of other professional reviewers.
>You can get the same lenses on DSLRAwww hunny buns doesn't know what a retro focal lens group is, or the effect it has on speed, image quality, lens cost and size. Show me your 12-24 2.8 lens, Sony has one smaller and more affordable than the EF f4 versions, I wonder what's going on there ;)
>You can put a "proper" focusing screen in a DSLRAh, what everyone wants, a much darker split prism that makes low light shooting near impossible!
>But DSLR have af trackingAnd it fucking sucks compared to modern mirrorless
>I don't need ai because I can tell the difference between focusing on eyelashes and eyeballs with a DSLRNo you can't Hun, I bet I get a MUCH better hit rate for critical focus, especially with a fast portrait lens.
>You don't know how to use a spot meterOh, and you can use it to get perfect exposure within 1\3rd of a stop? Or do you just get in the right ball park and call it close enough?
>Evf are laggy and noisy in low lightLol, no they're not, you keep exposing yourself as someone that's never used one.
>They bitch about lag in full daylightSony's evf lag is 23ms in good light, that's half as long as the shutter lag on a d800, evf lag & electronic shutter lag on Sony are faster than just shutter lag on a DSLR, you clown.
>>3782318>Zero lagBut more shutter lag, and can you see 23ms lag, that's very impressive ;)
>Accurate colorNot to what the camera sees ;)
>Accurate Dr and contrastNot to what the camera sees ;)
>Evf look like VGA screensOh you haven't used one then ;)
>No motion smearingSs preview is useful ;)
>Low lightEvf wins this every time ;)
>BaTtErY LiFeLmfao, I guess that's why a Nokia 3210 is better than a new Samsung galaxy eh ;)
>TrackingIs better on mirrorless
