>>3796103This is a passthrough.
The weird pattern is the fuji tranny shit. In areas with high contrasting colors, you see this stuff, in grey tones with low contrast it is almost entirely masked so it is almost imperceptible down at the bottom near the rails.
Worms come from this underlying patterns not playing nice with "enhance" features. Worms aren't part of Fuji sensors, they're a side effect, pic related is the actual issue.
Tranny is less likely to show moire in repeating checkerboard patterns compared to bayer but without enough resolution no sampling pattern is perfect and fuji's weird color layout does more harm than good for fine detail.
If you never intend to view your photos at 1:1 or care about the weird unnatural pattern, fuji is fine for you, but it's actually proven to be inferior in resolution. Some people are misguided because they're judging tranny with no OLPF vs bayer with OLPF. Also known as tranny with no AA (optically blur free) vs AA'd (literally blurred) bayer. When the two compete on an even playing field bayer wins.
>>3796113Yeah, no, if you adjust your picture shooting profile on Canon the SOOC JPEGs are good. Just turn saturation down from 11 and disable sharpening and they produce fine images.
I batch process my RAWs into 16-bit TIFFs with similar looking settings but higher IQ every once in a while, because they print better with less banding and often squeeze a bit more dynamic range in by not compressing the shadows as much due to slighhtly lower contrast in darktable compared to in-camera. At a glance the SOOC JPEGs look identical to the TIFFs but if you give them both a look the computer processed version wins every time, plus the ability to alter white balance is amazing. I rarely ever need to because my canon gets it good enough most of the time.
You shoot a color target and profile shit based on that and let software handle that if you need color accuracy. Grading is a meme.
