/p/ - Photography » Thread #3792856

[61 / 13 / ?]

1MiB, 1125x1507, 3C3B1E44-C663-4A9D-BC80-B18717329502.jpg

Anonymous Tue 05 Jan 2021 18:00:29 No.3792856 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3792888 >>3793731 >>3793922 >>3793993 >>3794503 >>3794563 >>3794869 >>3795371

This might be the wrong place to ask but I'm looking for a photographer that takes pics similar to these but the models often wear colored tights and drape over sofas and such.

The photos are from Kimber Beck

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Jan 2021 18:03:50 No.3792859 Report

Quoted By:

wOw So rAnDoM
mAnY aRt

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Jan 2021 18:39:04 No.3792871 Report

Quoted By: >>3792881 >>3794177 >>3794185

Edgy childish shit. It just seems like satanic vagina vibes.
>true beauty lies in horror as well
I know we get it. That's what everyone posts these days. Its cliche.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Jan 2021 18:58:57 No.3792881 Report

Quoted By: >>3793608 >>3793993

>>3792871
You don't like the female form? I get your whole satanic view but that's a really shallow perspective on these photos

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Jan 2021 19:04:37 No.3792888 Report

Quoted By: >>3792905

>>3792856
Francesca Woodman created this style.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 05 Jan 2021 19:30:31 No.3792905 Report

Quoted By:

>>3792888
Not quite what I'm referring to but Thank you!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Jan 2021 18:38:41 No.3793608 Report

Quoted By:

>>3792881
That's not what he said retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Jan 2021 21:36:57 No.3793731 Report

Quoted By:

>>3792856
2nd semester art students like these. No one else

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 06 Jan 2021 23:51:10 No.3793788 Report

Quoted By: >>3793999 >>3794288

This literally makes women look gross. None of these are pleasant. No one but faggoty lefties like painting women as ugly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 04:23:00 No.3793915 Report

Quoted By: >>3793999

the amount of jealousy in this thread ...

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 04:25:34 No.3793922 Report

Quoted By: >>3797488

>>3792856
Take the woman out, or replace with an afghan migrant "Child"

Each shot loses all significance.

You rely on women for your shots, which makes you a pandering nobody.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 07:25:24 No.3793980 Report

Quoted By: >>3794003

/p is against objectifying women and photographing women as objects draped over things is very against what this board is about.

This is just reducing women to an old tshirt you took off and threw over a chair.

That is not how /p sees women.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:15:38 No.3793993 Report

Quoted By:

>>3792856
Pretty lame stuff to be honest. It's like it tries to be provocative but falls prey to cliches every time. It's teenage rebellion.
>>3792881
If anything she found a way to make the female form look unappealing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:18:43 No.3793999 Report

Quoted By: >>3794189

>>3793788
Exactly. And it's not like the women themselves are bad looking, those are pretty nice bodies for the most part. But it's completely devoid of aesthetic sense.
>>3793915
>jealousy
kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:22:38 No.3794003 Report

Quoted By: >>3794012 >>3794180 >>3795230 >>3797392

>>3793980
It has nothing to do with objectification and you should stop pretending /p/ is one person and that that person is you. However, the photos are shitty.
There's plenty of "objectifying" photographers who take great pics. But these manage to be anti-erotic despite the nearly naked bodies in them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:35:11 No.3794012 Report

Quoted By: >>3794018

>>3794003

5 close up butt shots out of 12 images, seems alot more than a coincidence...
(in see through underwear no less because reasons...)
2 vagina "metaphor" shots
2 flower shots to try and make it not porn,
and then just 2 random shots of a girl tangled up in a plant because who knows why...

This has everything to do with objectifcation, the women are just objects treated as described, no faces, no personality, just objects...

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO b72dcfe559b570053cb1dac46fb55751.jpg, 874KiB, 2020x1586

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:43:25 No.3794018 Report

Quoted By: >>3794025 >>3794045 >>3794180

>>3794012
That's not the problem, the problem is that it looks like shit. Take Miles Alridge for example, he objectifies erotically. His photos are sexy. OP's are gross.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:48:33 No.3794025 Report

Quoted By: >>3794028 >>3794180

>>3794018

how is that objectification if the girls not naked or wearing see through clothing, i dont think you know what objectification means...

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:52:15 No.3794028 Report

Quoted By: >>3794030

>>3794025
They're legs, it doesn't have to be quasi-pornographic to be objectifying.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 08:57:08 No.3794030 Report

Quoted By: >>3794059

>>3794028

there is a big difference between a shot of a leg and a shot of a butt, one is just reducing a person to an object the other is not...

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 09:24:48 No.3794045 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794018
>Miles Alridge
holy shit man this madman took photographic maximalism to its limits. these images make me want to puke. he is a good photographer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 10:08:42 No.3794059 Report

Quoted By: >>3794060

>>3794030
Ever heard of foot fetish, footjobs and legjobs? It doesn't have to be genitalia to be sexually objectifying.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 10:11:05 No.3794060 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794059

good point, my argument has been undone by footjobs, theres a first for everything i guess.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 16:10:29 No.3794177 Report

Quoted By:

>>3792871
>satanic vagina vibes.
what

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 16:13:15 No.3794180 Report

Quoted By: >>3794187

>>3794025
>>3794018
>>3794003
>objectification

such a dumb term. didn't know /p/ was woke leftist twitter users

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 16:16:55 No.3794185 Report

Quoted By:

>>3792871
>satanic vagina vibes.
Lmao I was looking for a way to describe the OP pics. Never seen something so unappealing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 16:26:07 No.3794187 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794180
/p/ is has always been one the most wokest board f this website.
maybe because of pee being one of the most normalfag board of the website

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 16:33:47 No.3794189 Report

Quoted By: >>3794238 >>3794242 >>3794494 >>3794579

>>3793999
>kek
do you really think one wouldn't notice how jealous you are? I mean, really? you believe that? it so obvious that you could look from a mile and still see it. and the more you argue the more obvious it becomes.
it's a funny thing, that the one out of 1000 threads on this board, where I think 'well, these are finally some watchable works' immediately gets thrown shit upon. you all here can't stand it, when somebody does some actual work. seems like this just reminds you at your miserable lives and that you will never achieve anything because you are untalented, with no creative and social skills and overall not more than dogs in the manger.
and to compensate that, you start building up fantasy arguments on how this or that would be bad and shit. it's really rediculous. "it's completely devoid of aesthetic sense" ... do you even listen to yourself? what do you think this blubberish should be? you lack of basic comprehension and just try to sound intellectual because you hope that that dork of OP does get his package for showing you what can be done with a basic amount of talent.
you are embarrasing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 17:52:17 No.3794238 Report

Quoted By: >>3794345

>>3794189
Nice wall of cope. I'm not jealous, the pics aren't impressive but clichéd and pretentious. Your reaction makes me wonder if they're yours though. Maybe you're a coomer who hasn't had the chance to see proper photography yet so this garbage blows your mind.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 18:01:03 No.3794242 Report

Quoted By: >>3794248

>>3794189
just ignore such braindead fags man.
don't you see that this is a gearfaggotory board and most of the poster who post their shit are beginners?
notice how they can only criticise but can't give better suggestions?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 18:11:08 No.3794248 Report

Quoted By: >>3794253

>>3794242
>can't give better suggestions
lmao I literally posted Miles Alridge's work ITT, a photographer actually worth being jealous of. I'm not the type to be jealous so I admire his work instead. The pics in the OP are as if someone described erotic photography to an alien and he tried to replicate it from what he was told.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 18:18:50 No.3794253 Report

Quoted By: >>3794260

>>3794248
>Miles Alridge
his work is no way "erotic" if anything his work is anti-erotic vulgar maximalism puke inducing photos. his work is good for but it's not stylistically similar to poetic pastel, anon bodies, subtle, female figure elements in op's pic related.
I do agree with you that the work in op's pic related is full of cliches.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 838958ffe315132f8984721e5c0fa24e (...).jpg, 136KiB, 1200x630

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 18:31:42 No.3794260 Report

Quoted By: >>3794269

>>3794253
>subtle
Kek
The pics in the OP look like someone coming from the hardcore porn industry would come up with when trying to "do art".
Also how is Aldridge's work "puke-inducing"? lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 19:02:21 No.3794269 Report

Quoted By: >>3794622 >>3794702

>>3794260
are you fucking retarded? those photo aren't hard-core porn in any. by this logic you can accuse every painter of "someone coming from the hardcore porn industry" who painted nude in the history of painting.
go see Mapplethrope's and Antoine d'Agata's artwork if you're so concerned with "the hardcore porn industry"
>Also how is Aldridge's work "puke-inducing"? lol
it is puke inducing because it is reminiscent of fake advertisement's cheap fashion barbie doll-esque plasticky colours mimicking the consumer maximalist pop disneyland aesthetic of late modern usa. in short it's totally disgusting. if that was his aim then he succeeded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 19:50:45 No.3794288 Report

Quoted By:

>>3793788
Isn't that the goal? Attention through epatage, I literally thought that grapefruit was gore and clicked on it to see if it truly was. Asses hanging over the fence or bathtubs also create kind of a dead meat feeling.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO memememe-meme-25516725.png, 34KiB, 500x304

Anonymous Thu 07 Jan 2021 21:18:19 No.3794345 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794238
>I'm not jealous

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 01:11:07 No.3794494 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794189
tl;dr.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Dazed.jpg, 248KiB, 1050x682

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 01:20:28 No.3794503 Report

Quoted By: >>3794619

>>3792856
Prue stent & Honey long?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 03:51:45 No.3794563 Report

Quoted By:

>>3792856
this shit's real bad

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 04:07:38 No.3794579 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794189
if this wasn't a copypasta well, gg

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1609993033314.jpg, 260KiB, 800x609

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 05:48:48 No.3794614 Report

Quoted By: >>3794616 >>3794868

It's sad because art displays culture. And this exemplifies an attempt to remake beauty as unsettling and unnatural. This gaslights artists to believe that our culture wants a beautified evil. A semicompetant photographer sees this and to make his work stand out he mimics this, and follows this path of falsity, continuing a path antithetical to natural beauty and healthy culture.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 05:56:17 No.3794616 Report

Quoted By: >>3794868

>>3794614

I think of it more as a response to instagram, instagram is flooding millions of photos of hot girls daily, nothing can compete with it, hence why the only path left is to go weird

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 06:08:31 No.3794619 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794503
nice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 06:21:53 No.3794622 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794269
>are you fucking retarded? those photo aren't hard-core porn in any
I have to ask you the same question. They aren't porn, but I didn't say they were. My argument is that they are the tasteless kind of photos a pornographer would come up with when attempting to venture into actual art.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 11:28:12 No.3794702 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794269
>are you fucking retarded? those photo aren't hard-core porn in any.
that's not what he said though
the retard here is you

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 16:59:50 No.3794868 Report

Quoted By:

>>3794614
>And this exemplifies an attempt to remake beauty as unsettling and unnatural.
I can get behind that as a subject worth exploring, "stop worshipping beautiful people" is not a bad slogan at all, and stands against what you typically see on Instagram as another anon outlined
>>3794616 - a neverending sea of women each with a small drooling crowd around them. Now as to whether anything in the OP does it well is whole another matter.
Which brings me to another question: why everyone on the thread just go with erotic = good and argue around that point?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 17:06:32 No.3794869 Report

Quoted By: >>3794930

>>3792856
I don't want to sound like an incel but why are all female artists obsessed with their vaginas we get it they went through the sexual ravioli and child birth is a miracle yadda yadda

The bathtub shot is pretty keno though

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 18:28:28 No.3794921 Report

Quoted By: >>3794930

Im gonna live with myself and say it's post-post-modernism

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 18:42:41 No.3794930 Report

Quoted By: >>3795012

>>3794869
>I don't want to sound like an incel but why are all female artists obsessed with their vaginas
predictable statement coming from a pleb faggot redditor who has no knowledge about the history of photography.

>>3794921
you're giving her a very big compliment. it's not like she is doing anything new.
if anything that is post-post-modernism then it's this >>3787384 thread.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 04-17paaeviviane-sassen11.jpg, 359KiB, 770x1024

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 22:10:43 No.3795012 Report

Quoted By: >>3795017 >>3797392

>>3794930

Compared to Viviane sassen, who regularly works with the female figure including vagainas. you will notice how watered down and derivative this lady's work is. you pretentious walnut

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 30_001.jpg, 31KiB, 367x550

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 22:23:57 No.3795017 Report

Quoted By: >>3795018

>>3795012
THIS IS NOW A VIVIANE SASSEN THREAD POST CONTORTED FEMALE BODIES

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 377461.jpg, 163KiB, 900x721

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 22:25:02 No.3795018 Report

Quoted By: >>3795019

>>3795017

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO unnamed.jpg, 18KiB, 385x512

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 22:26:03 No.3795019 Report

Quoted By: >>3795021 >>3795380 >>3797509

>>3795018

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO images (7).jpg, 6KiB, 188x267

Anonymous Fri 08 Jan 2021 22:28:11 No.3795021 Report

Quoted By:

>>3795019
I'll sneak this Margret bourke white in here too

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jan 2021 10:11:24 No.3795230 Report

Quoted By: >>3797392 >>3797395

>>3794003
Very based take

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 09 Jan 2021 23:38:29 No.3795371 Report

Quoted By: >>3797392 >>3797395

>>3792856
These are trite and aesthetically devoid
>harsh coloration for the sake of looking edgy
>deliberately making the subjects look bland and lifeless
>boring composition with mostly dead center subjects
>shifted black points
shit tier

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO lol.png, 607KiB, 1203x855

Anonymous Sun 10 Jan 2021 00:02:47 No.3795380 Report

Quoted By:

>>3795019
lole

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Jan 2021 10:06:46 No.3797392 Report

Quoted By: >>3797395

>>3795371
>>3795230
>>3794003
>>3795012
B A S E D

I'm sick of these derivative, VSCO looking shots of lifeless bodies. Boring. It all looks the same, reminds me of the faggot MCU

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Jan 2021 10:12:18 No.3797395 Report

Quoted By:

>>3795230
Thanks anon
>>3795371
Agreed
>>3797392
>MCU
Marvel?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 13 Jan 2021 13:25:36 No.3797488 Report

Quoted By:

>>3793922
>take the subject out of your shot and it loses significance

is this not true for every photo?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO cover9.jpg, 27KiB, 800x450

Anonymous Wed 13 Jan 2021 13:50:00 No.3797509 Report

Quoted By:

>>3795019

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches